And you use a tank that doesnt have a good shell, mobility and armour.
Also, you are complaining about a 30 second repair. The same hit on most other tanks would have been a OHK So?
Its not only my opinion. Abrams are one of the most coddled tanks at top tier. They did not need a 5 second reload and yet they somehow managed to get it.
And yes, I only paly one nations, because ground is a god aweful grind that takes way too long. So I only play one nation. Doesnt mean Im wrong. You have never played the Challenger 2 and yet claim its fine
I’ve told you many times Morvran, US mains wanted armor buff, DU to the hull and turret ring fix, but Gaijin gave them a 5 sec reload to shut them up, like they did with every nation that get bad Top Tier tanks.
I never did, but it get somethings that many nation don’t which are spall liners and also a 5 sec reload but with a minus, they’re fine considering the tank still didn’t get the basket nerf, if they do you’d be complaining all over the forum about it like i’m doing now.
It gets the turret cheeks as armor and that’s it, sides can penetrated, front can be penetrated, where is the armour that you see can you tell me exactly where??
The same mobility in the Abrams is in the Leopards, maybe slower but it’s still fine.
Shell is second best one in the game and it should be better to counter Kontakt as every NATO nation should’ve gotten already, but it would upset some of the Comrades.
It does if you say that the SEP is like the 2A7 and they should be in a higher BR, this is a dumb take honestly coming from you.
That still doesnt change a simple fact US mains always seem to ignore. They have the second best MBT in game right here right now, with an amazing support line-up in the form of a very good IFV and SPAA. 2 things not every nation has. Some dont even have 1.
Sure, US mains want the Abrams to go from the second best to the best tank in the game. But that doesnt change the fact its still better than what most nations have at top tier at the moment
Its still missing most of them
They have a 4 round ready rack. 5 seconds doesnt last very long, and replenishment time is 20 seconds per round. You average more like 6.5-7.5 second reloads most matches.
(it should be 28 round ready rack)
CR2 doesnt have a turret basket IRL. So it wont ever get one.
But it wont change a thing. A round that has penned enough to hit the turret basket, has taken out all the crew and the ammo rack. So survivability wont change much.
actually a slim chance it might be a buff by creating more things for spall to hit. Though agian, doesnt have one IRL.
Yes, you have accurately described the Challenger 2.
It should be.
Leopard 2A7 and M1A2 Sepv2 are far far closer together in performance than the 2A7 and SepV2 vs most other top tier MBTs in game are.
Spanish had a really good suggestion for what decompression would look like
This is actually delusional at this point, i’ve played the US for years and everything you said here i somehow can’t find, “Muh the second best MBT in the game” but you fail to tell me how its the “Best”
Again you fail to tell me how is the Abrams good, “Muh mobility and reload” as almost every NATO nation get, “Muh armour” you again fail to tell me exactly where is the “Armour” at this point its a myth.
Then go ahead and complain about it, Gaijin proved many times that it listens to its community.
Then its a blessing.
So you’re saying that the tank that you call the second best tank is actually like the CR2, got it.
But i fail to see how is the SEP qualified to be at the same BR as the mighty 2A7.
Then its a design problem, how is this related to the topic we’re arguing about.
I have told you why its the second best. Its widely agreed to be the second best in game. Only US mains pretend its not.
It has good mobility, great firepower and above average survivabiltiy.
you have yet to actually give a valid reason why its not the second best in the game.
Your arguments so far can be applied to everyone else. and are not unique to the US. but everyone else comes with more issues.
We tried. We’ve given up. They dont listen to minor nations.
No, you described the CR2 perfectly .Abrams has fine protection. I;ve got to aim for specific weakspots with L27A1 otherwise it wont pen against a Abrams and even then, its usually takes 2 rounds to kill.
Its equal in mobility, and maybe even superior in firepower. At the cost of slightly worse survivability.
Not much
The basket isn’t entirely the issue for the M1/Leopard
It’s the solid steel floor of the basket acting as a critical component of the horizontal drive
Its still incredibly funny to me that one of the vehicles that people were wanting realistic modules for so it could be nerfed only ended up getting buffed (2S38)
EVERY vehicle should have as many modules as realistic as the game can practically allow. No matter what nation it belongs to. Every single one. If some people have ulterior motives who cares? Their ulterior motives are meaningless. Give EVERY VEHICLE the same level of realism as is practical.
If you just want hitpoint tanks where modules are irrelevant and can be magically fully repaired instantly (literally instantly…) well there’s another game out there you may like…