I am afraid I wasn’t any help there. The Kfir C.7 only sees the F16’s at 13.0 and the F16C is 13.7.
“Cries in dark painful laughter in every single match always being a maximum uptier…”
2 Likes
As someone who likes playing bombers and who has tried to play the F-111A for the first time since before the nerf, I am totally fine with most of the base-stealing planes to be unable to do so. I doubt any of the fighters that took bases from bombers have only rockets, though.
1 Like
As far as I could gather people were only using rockets to get more RP, if they gave bombs a bit higher reward people would bomb more and everyone would be happy.
People were using rockets because people could fly faster.
From what I remember (I’ve pretty much only played ground the past half a year) the 500 lb and 750lb bombs give the same SL/RP as rockets, but the rockets imposed less drag. Plus they could be fired before another bomber who only had bombs, which let you win a race to a base every once in a while.
Hilarious . " Ah Mr Wisla…I’ve been expecting you "
3 Likes
Thats IS the problem.
Forcing someone to play as YOU want.
If people want do what others want - they go to work.
I want, to all 1/2-spawn players been locked after leave the match for hour at least.
All nations, all branches, all gamemodes.
But people can said to me “duck you” in this case, and be absolutely right about that.
Game exist not for some boyos dicktate others how they must play.
And for sure, reducing variability of gameplay, by nerfs like this - it’s a opposite of what game developers must do.
They have more than enough bugs to work with, like flight models, damage system, implementation of armor/penetration system for planes, balance, gameplay, etc.
But they “fix” opportunity for grind to players.
Very goddamn vital change. Bravo.
3 Likes
Then they shouldn’t have purchased a fighter if they didn’t want to play as a fighter…
No one is forcing you to buy fighters; just the tactic of partially damaging bases with interceptors is silly.
There are no multi-spawning in air.
They’ve never done this.
Employee Alvis for the defense as always.
3 Likes
Well…
-
You can show me many pure bombers as high-tier premiums? I know only Tornado WTD.
-
If plane have bombs - player can play as he/she/it want.
I cant remember in Licence Agreement, or in the Gaijin Store, the line “I solemnly swear to use fighters ONLY to hunt aircraft, and at the cost of my life, not to resort to the ungodly attack on ground targets.”
- The most important - It’s none of your business.
People play game, and more of it - they pay money, to get through grindwall with lesser suffering.
The last thing they need is the opinion of a guy who has researched everything he wanted and is now ruining the lives of others.
If you want pure, distilled, high-skill PvP, go to regimental/duels.
And in random - play yourself, and don’t interfere with others playing as they want.
(With the exception of completely playful methods like shooting down. I clarified, simply because there were already not the most intelligent representatives of the human race who, due to a lack of argumentation, began to cling to my formulations.)
1 Like
What rubbish Alvis C’mon.
So the M109 can only be used as long range indirect fire artillery? SPAA can only fire at planes?
You have your tongue permanently up the snails backside but you don’t talk rubbish to this degree normally.It’s normally more eloquent rubbish.
Are there two of you now? Do you have to work shifts to get the coverage?
2 Likes
“Then they shouldn’t have bought fighters” Would be viable if people wanting to play bombers only needed bombers to continue up the tree but unfortunately they need an X amount of vehicles to begin researching the next tier.
No one is telling you you can’t partially damage a base.
People are only telling you that the tactic is stupid when the fighter is great and requires little skill.
@EddieVanHalo
I see you’re here coming to the defense of Gaijin again, with Sanch and Noldor agreeing with you defending Gaijin from my criticism.
Why do you think SPAA should only be against planes, Eddie?
Why do you think M109 should only be direct fire?
@Ladies_Man_217 accusing all of War Thunder’s critics of being Gaijin employees.
Defyn, Tim’s Variety, myself, Jaek, PhlyDaily, etc aren’t trolls and aren’t Gaijin employees just cause we’re criticizing War Thunder.
It’s funny watching everyone here attack WT critics.
“Criticizing War Thunder is defending it.” - Ladies, Eddie, Noldor.
Quote the post you made in this thread where you criticized War Thunder
2 Likes
The community doesn’t understand the community.
3 Likes
Right here; criticizing Gaijin for allowing the rocket bug to exist.
A compliment to the bug fix is a criticism to the bug existing to begin with.
If we want to discuss my other criticisms of War Thunder rather than this specific topic of Gaijin allowing people to abuse rockets for so long; we can take those discussions to DMs.
Most conspiricies make sense honestly.
2 Likes
I think the snail should only make map changes once a year only and fully announce them all or raise a vote.They should have a map rotaion of all maps and seperetre maps above 8BR
Alter BR on older vehicles once year only or stop it altogether to create stability and ease of line ups.
Do zero nerfing of anything unless it is full announced.
If they want everybody at top tier then let them make their way to it unhindered instead of having to buy $60 premiums they can’t use for an elite direct entry.
Gaijin create paranoia and a lack of trust in the Devs and the company.
Gaijin only implement changes they want irrelevant of what is said by the public on their own forum.
I know Alvis as the prime critic of Gaijin is with us all on this.