im aware of that, but flares =/= jamming.
I thought gaijin decided to just say “oh by the way were adding EW to the game lol” as sidenote in this devblog
1 Like
@Stona_WT @Smin1080p_WT
Any news about Romanian subtree? This nation was claimed to be placed in the Italian TT, but still hasn’t been called a subtree. Can we expect more regular tree Romanian additions?
PS I have a lot of hopes for Romania)
Spoiler
Theoretical full Italian Ground Forces tech tree
Italian-Hungarian-Romanian GF TT
Ground TT by the link with working folders, above^
Other tech, arrows show folders:
Air in old format, needs to be updated (white!):
5 Likes
I recommend you tag Smin to ask about this
2 Likes
Does this come with some extra RP gain or are we still pretending this is 2014 when it comes to the economy?
Here’s another 5 million RP of copy paste vehicles you already have which you can grind with an RP gain that is based on the game before cold war vehicles even existed.
Cannot express how tired I am of this, the level of disrespect for a player’s time and money is unlike anything else.
If the RP gain matched the RP requirements we’d be closer to getting 10x than this.
3 Likes
We need something like this: Cross-Tree Research Bonus for Duplicate Vehicles - A Copy-Paste Solution
7 Likes
This wouldn’t apply to the Malaysian vehicles though.
From the suggestion;
The MiG-29N is a MiG-29SD (which isn’t present in game), the F/A-18D is a different variant of the F/A-18 and the Su-30MKM has other armament and avionics that set it apart.
The only other F-2 variants would be the XF-2A (identical to the F-2A ADTW) and F-2B (a two seater F-2A). That’s it. The F-2 Super Kai never went past paper. The F-15J(M) Late variant would just have IRST and maybe MAWS, neither of which would bump it to 14.0. The only thing that’d bump it up is modern missiles that would only come with other modern missiles, changing functionally nothing for Japan. The F-15JSI is nowhere near done and we know literally nothing about it.
The subtrees are a good choice. Nobody complained about Thailand.
1 Like
Yeah, although it should still help in other areas of the tree (some Thai and Japanese jets)
For jets, I guess F-84G, F-5A, A-7E and JAS39C. The other jets iirc have differences that wouldn’t help.
Just to make it clear, I’m completely for the idea.
All RP requirements could be cut by 50% across the board for everything at the very least and it would still be bad.
What I said, the guy has 0 clue what he’s talking about, I asked what his ideas for the alternative domestic Japanese jets that would be at the same BRs as the Malaysian and he hasn’t replied, there are none, he’s just whining about copy paste without even providing any actually viable options, like I said just a whiner, he’s not even at top tier Japan btw
1 Like
clearly the very real Super Kai
2 Likes
You and me in the same wavelength ong The Royal Malaysian Air Force Subtree is Coming to War Thunder! - #172 by KAISERLION
3 Likes
Guy, you’ve done nothing but whine the entire time.
I play sim. I used to play it alot more back when you didnt have the same aircraft one the other team every single game. Now you cant hop into a room without an F18, F4, MiG29, similar vehicles on both teams. I get you would like to fill out the highst BR (while completely ignoring the previous 3 ranks) but as a sim player, I’m hinest tired of seeing the same aircraft on both sides of the game. It gets tiring when youre trying to get an visual ID on an aircraft and you cant tell if its a Swiss F18 or an American F18 or if its a Soviet MiG29 or the Romanian one.
I get you probably dont play sim and could care less. But when theres an issue in the game and when people give their feed back, its not whining, its feedback that this is not a good move for the game.
All you’ve done is whine that people would rathwr not have time and resources go towards 3 aircraft that weve seen before when theres dozens on dozens of vehicles that have zero representation in the game.
I get you’re giddy like a school girl to grind through another 3 top tier jets we’ve seen before, but the majority of people parent.
Next time read the room.
4 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
2 Likes
“This was revealed to me in a dream”
3 Likes
Guy, half your comments in here are just saying people are whining. Youve been the biggest whiner here without offering solutions to the conserns people have.
You want a solution? Dont add soviet fighter in a TT thats always on NATO teams and dont add NATO vehicles into redfor teams.
I say I dont want to see team rosters in SIM look like an arcade roster and you say I’d rather the trees be filled. Well you say youd rather the trees be filled and I’d reply with I’d rather my sim round not be filled like an arcade match.
Unless you’ve actually got a solution to some conserns that people have. All your comments calling people whiners for their feedback, is in fact whining. Accept that other people dont have the same copy paste midset as you and move on guy.
1 Like
1 Like
Sim matchmaking by operator nation would be my solution. So GDR vehicles can fight on warsaw pact teams, so can warsaw Hungary, but NATO Germany and Italy would still fight on the NATO side.
Obviously you’d still see some mixed vehicles, like the west German MiG-29G for example, or from more inbetween nations such as India, but at that point it is far more grounded in reality.
Though this can be thrown off by squadding with different nations, the same can be done now with a US / USSR squad so I won’t count this as a flaw of the system.
5 Likes
I dont get why you’re complaining about a gamemode that you barely even play. you have like 10 days total on sim
1 Like