The only other F-2 variants would be the XF-2A (identical to the F-2A ADTW) and F-2B (a two seater F-2A). That’s it. The F-2 Super Kai never went past paper. The F-15J(M) Late variant would just have IRST and maybe MAWS, neither of which would bump it to 14.0. The only thing that’d bump it up is modern missiles that would only come with other modern missiles, changing functionally nothing for Japan. The F-15JSI is nowhere near done and we know literally nothing about it.
The subtrees are a good choice. Nobody complained about Thailand.
What I said, the guy has 0 clue what he’s talking about, I asked what his ideas for the alternative domestic Japanese jets that would be at the same BRs as the Malaysian and he hasn’t replied, there are none, he’s just whining about copy paste without even providing any actually viable options, like I said just a whiner, he’s not even at top tier Japan btw
Guy, you’ve done nothing but whine the entire time.
I play sim. I used to play it alot more back when you didnt have the same aircraft one the other team every single game. Now you cant hop into a room without an F18, F4, MiG29, similar vehicles on both teams. I get you would like to fill out the highst BR (while completely ignoring the previous 3 ranks) but as a sim player, I’m hinest tired of seeing the same aircraft on both sides of the game. It gets tiring when youre trying to get an visual ID on an aircraft and you cant tell if its a Swiss F18 or an American F18 or if its a Soviet MiG29 or the Romanian one.
I get you probably dont play sim and could care less. But when theres an issue in the game and when people give their feed back, its not whining, its feedback that this is not a good move for the game.
All you’ve done is whine that people would rathwr not have time and resources go towards 3 aircraft that weve seen before when theres dozens on dozens of vehicles that have zero representation in the game.
I get you’re giddy like a school girl to grind through another 3 top tier jets we’ve seen before, but the majority of people parent.
Guy, half your comments in here are just saying people are whining. Youve been the biggest whiner here without offering solutions to the conserns people have.
You want a solution? Dont add soviet fighter in a TT thats always on NATO teams and dont add NATO vehicles into redfor teams.
I say I dont want to see team rosters in SIM look like an arcade roster and you say I’d rather the trees be filled. Well you say youd rather the trees be filled and I’d reply with I’d rather my sim round not be filled like an arcade match.
Unless you’ve actually got a solution to some conserns that people have. All your comments calling people whiners for their feedback, is in fact whining. Accept that other people dont have the same copy paste midset as you and move on guy.
Sim matchmaking by operator nation would be my solution. So GDR vehicles can fight on warsaw pact teams, so can warsaw Hungary, but NATO Germany and Italy would still fight on the NATO side.
Obviously you’d still see some mixed vehicles, like the west German MiG-29G for example, or from more inbetween nations such as India, but at that point it is far more grounded in reality.
Though this can be thrown off by squadding with different nations, the same can be done now with a US / USSR squad so I won’t count this as a flaw of the system.
You were literally whining and you still are, so the core problem you have is redfor and bluefor jets being in the same tree, I too defended in the ASEAN thread that they should keep Japan mostly western, but mixed fleets have been going on for ages already and are countries with mixed fleets not supposed to be represented? Because how dare the modern military industrial complex export their gear? How dare countries buy from the very few manufacturers of military vehicles we have left? This isn’t WW2 anymore where almost everyone and their grandma could build a plane, so yes you’re whining about the inevitable of modern times and YOU are the one who failed to provide any alternatives for the problem you have voiced besides “don’t add blue to redfor and vice versa” and you don’t wanna be labeled a whiner lmao, or do you want paper vehicles? Make up your mind sir
Like man lend lease vehicle these days are barely a problem in sim as everyone at top tier gets a good radar and stuff. I understand complaining about prop tiers, as there visual ID is what matters, but at top tier which these new malaysian vehicles are? Everyone gets radars that are able to IFF. And besides there are nato planes that are always on red side anyways (just look at germany) and vice versa
Exactly, IFFs and radars advanced enough to mostly identify what they’re facing, like I said he doesn’t even have top tier Japan, as for the rest of the actual top tiers he has, not to be toxic but his stats are abysmal in RB and Sim both lol
yeah, the new su30mkm finally gives me an excuse to finish grinding out the Japanese tt. I have previously only went up onto the phantom because I found that I once i got the F-15 for America why would I grind out the another F-15 just cause its japanese? but the new Sukhoi 30 is unique because it allows you to play a flanker on blue side which will be quite fun and interesting
