Cross-Tree Research Bonus for Duplicate Vehicles - A Copy-Paste Solution

Cross-Tree Research Bonus for Duplicate Vehicles - A Copy-Paste Solution

COPY PASTE SOL

One of the most frustrating aspects of copy-paste vehicles in War Thunder is having to grind the exact same vehicles multiple times just because it appears in different tech trees. This repetition can feel redundant and discouraging for players who want to explore multiple nations or sub-trees.


To address this, a simple system that recognizes when a player already researched a specific vehicle in another tech tree and reduces the grind accordingly.

Example:
If a player has already unlocked and purchased a vehicle in one tree (for example, the Finnish T-72M), and then encounters the same vehicle in another tree, (like the East German T-72M,) the game should automatically apply a 50% discount across the board.

* 50% less RP required to unlock the vehicle
* 50% less SL cost for the vehicle and its crew
* 50% less RP required to unlock the modifications
* 50% less SL cost for the modifications

This would reduce the grind without removing it entirely, keeping a sense of progression while respecting the player’s past efforts.


FAQ

What qualifies as a “copy-paste vehicle” under this system?

A “copy-paste vehicle” is one that is mechanically and functionally identical to a vehicle already present in another tech tree. This includes vehicles with the same performance, armament, and core design, regardless of which nation uses them or what camouflage, insignia, or designation they have. Minor visual differences such as paint schemes, roundels, or country-specific names are not enough to make the vehicle unique. However, if a vehicle has meaningful changes such as improved armor, a different set of missiles, or a modified flight model, it is no longer considered a copy-paste. At that point it becomes a unique variant and should be treated as a separate vehicle in terms of progression. The Strv 122B+ wouldn’t, for example be discounted via the unlocked German Leopard 2s, as it’s not a “copy-paste.”

Would premiums count?

No. A premium vehicle already has many advantages. Additionally, premiums are often not identical to other vehicles (except most captured units).

Which vehicles would receive the bonus?

All types with identical copies within other trees. I.e ground vehicles, naval vehicles, aircraft and rotorcraft.

Isn’t 50% too much?

No. It’s of course the War Thunder Team that is in charge of this feature if it gets implemented, but imagine this: You’ve already built a computer once. You spent hours researching compatibility, figuring out the instructions, sorting the parts, and dealing with the work of putting it together. Now, a year later, you buy the exact same model, with the exact same parts. Would it make sense to expect that second build and its research to take just as long? Of course not. You already know the process, the tools, and the little tricks. It still takes effort, but not as much as the first time.
Also note that this is a feature that makes it a bit easier for newer players, who are just starting out their second tree.

All right then, but wouldn’t 50% still be to much in SL?

Not necessarily.
Since it will take ~50% less time to unlock the vehicle, you will also not be able to earn as much SL as you would if you grinded for a longer time. In other words:
While the SL cost is reduced by 50%, you’re also spending ~50% less time researching the vehicle during the grind. Since the vehicle takes half the RP and modification RP to unlock, players will naturally spend less time playing to grind the vehicle, and later, less time playing it in stock condition. That means fewer matches, fewer opportunities to earn SL, and in the end, the total SL gained during the grind is also 50% lower, since ~50% less time was spent on grinding. So the reduced SL price balances out the reduced earning potential, it’s a proportional tradeoff.

Will players need to unlock a specific nation’s vehicle first in order to receive the bonus? For instance, the Soviet T-34-85 before the Finnish version?

No. While that would be a realistic approach, it would introduce too much complexity and questions related to the system.

How does it benefit both the War Thunder Team and its playerbase?

While it wouldn’t excuse the addition of only “copy paste vehicles”, it would still make it easier for the playerbase to enjoy trees with more copy paste. Something that would alow more “copy-paste-ish” tech tree’s to get added, such as the Yugoslav, the V4 or the Greco-Iberian tech tree, thus more possible content for the War Thunder Team to add, and for its playerbase to enjoy.

When does the bonus activate?

The bonus only applies when you’ve unlockeded and bought a specific vehicle with identical copies in other trees, or within the own tech tree if such duplicates exist. Example: You unlock the Swedish Strv 121A. Now the German Leopard 2A4 and other identical copies (like the Swedish TT Finnish Leopard 2A4) recieves the bonus and its discounts.

How is it determined whether two vehicles are identical?

This would be handled internally by the developers based on technical data such as same model, same performance stats, weapons, and protection, etc. Players would likely see some kind of duplicate tag in the vehicle’s research window to indicate that it qualifies for the bonus. Historical evidence can also be used to check if a country did in fact modify its imported vehicle.

Wouldn’t this just encourage even more copy-paste vehicles in the game?

Not necessarily, and even if it did, that wouldn’t be a bad thing if handled correctly. This system does not reward developers for flooding trees with identical vehicles. It simply reduces the frustration players feel when encountering those vehicles after already unlocking them elsewhere. It also opens up the door for nations or sub-trees that need to rely on shared vehicles, like Yugoslavia, the V4, or Greco-Iberian trees, by making them more accessible and less punishing to play. In short, this system does not promote more copy-paste. It helps make existing and necessary overlap less repetitive, while allowing room for more diverse tech trees overall.


Please note: This idea is not entirely new, and similar suggestions have been brought up before by other players. I’ve seen concepts along the same lines discussed here on the official forums, mentioned in my own comment section, and even touched upon by creators like TheEuropeanCanadian. This version builds on that shared idea and tries to turn it into a clear and structured proposal.

I believe this system would make the experience of encountering copy-paste vehicles feel more rewarding, while also preserving balance. Thank you for reading! I’m open for discussion below!

DO ALSO NOTE:

DISCLAIMER: This post is entirely based on gameplay experience and vehicle performance, not visual appearance. For example, if a Leopard 2A4 performs the same but happens to feature extra chassis details like country specific details, shovels, boxes or storage, it still provides the same gameplay experience even if it looks slightly different. The War Thunder design team is incredibly talented, and this post is not meant as criticism towards them. Without their attention to detail, War Thunder simply wouldn’t be War Thunder.


Would you like to see this feature in War Thunder?

  • Yes
  • No
0 voters
17 Likes

My issue is T-72M1 in Germany is a copy-paste of the unique T-72M1 model from Italy, not Finland.

I must vote no on behalf of artists whose work is increasingly disrespected by false accusations of copy-paste.

Finland’s T-72M1 being lumped in with M55 is not respectful to the 3D modeler that made a brand new T-72 model for the game, and then the modeler that did Italy’s.
Of course Italy’s got copy-pasted to Germany at the end of the day.

With the bonus RP system we already have, I feel that’s more than enough as is.

Edit:
And sadly gameplay reasons are too arbitrary for me. Too many exceptions need to be made with it, such as Leclerc and M1A1.

Yes, I think overall that’s a great idea, I actuallly wanted to suggest it myself.
Posted something similar, but maybe more radical:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/1mvy11o/the_idea_to_remove_the_need_to_research_identical/

This would make the grind easier/less annoying and for some players it could even become a motivation to start researching a new nation.

1 Like

unlike some who would regard the smallest of physical details as a unique vehicle in terms of gameplay experience… i argue that while they are unique physically, gameplay wise, they are the exact same

hence, it is necessary for players to not be made to grind through the same kind off vehicle across multiple tech trees and ruin their experience by repetitive matches spanning 2-300 times

+1!

1 Like

+1 I’ve always thought this should be a thing

+1 why not
I’m tired of copy&paste things

1 Like

How’d you know it’s unique? for example the M46 the did for France was the same just someone added extras on top.
That by all manners is a copy and pasted vehicle.

Though it is far more blatant in the likes of the M1A1 HC, T80 UE-1 and the 2A4M which they literally just Copy and pasted then added a skin too.

No work goes into that , at all.

Did you not actually look at the premiums?
Sure, the base model’s the same, but the added decorations exist on them.
Sure, it’s not research work, but it’s decisions on what decorations to incorporate.
Commission the model.
Commission the image artists.

Which are already in game, which are not new to the game.

Which means it is copied and pasted, as was proven on the french M46

That goes to gaijin, they tell the artists what they want and they make it.
The artists aren’t just told make us a T72 and let to run free with it.

The models themselves have been proven to be reused time and time again now. There isn’t anything wrong per say with that, but acting as if it is all freshly created and new materials is disingenuous.
Click-Bait by all standards is new even when it is mostly a copy of an already in game vehicle stats wise.

Also I’ve got most prems in game , seeings I have historical skins on, they are literally copy paste TT vehicles or other prems.

The original M1A1 HC, T80UE1, 2A4M are all unique not the exact copies with a skin sold at 70 bangers

EDIT: wee piece of proof, M46 for France, BP_
even brought across a bug from the US M46 with it’s fuel canister shadows.
Screenshot 2025-10-28 103312

Please read this, everyone. I love the work of the war thunder artists.

3 Likes

In theory this is a great idea.

In practice it will fail because of Gaijin’s greed. Any vehicle that isn’t exactly 1 to 1 equal will be treated as an entirely different tank. Gaijin would add it to a dozen or so vehicles where they have no choice because they are actually completely identical, but then not others.

Why? Well because the more you have to grind, the more likely you are to pay your money to get GE for premium time or modification research.

And even then, with the dozen or so vehicles that receive this bonus, they would just ever so slightly increase the RP needs for other vehicles. Gaijin pretty much has a “quota” of RP necessary for each rank of a tech tree if I remember right.

Bumped up either way.

2 Likes

It’s up to Gaijin of course to decide what vehicles are duplicate (or maybe it’s better to create some different name for them in the game like “international”), but in my opinion, such vehicles should be only regular, have same modifications*, be placed at the same battle rating, in most cases share the same 3d model.

*maybe with some exclusions, like when additional modification is minor and doesn’t affect battle rating and you won’t get RP reduced for such modification;

Probably even in case of Strv121, it shouldn’t be considered identical to 2A4, not only because there are some minor differences, but also differences in shells available.

Examples of my understanding:
Should get bonus - Italian, French, Chinese M4A4; American and French M26;
Shouldn’t get bonus - Italian and British Sherman VC; American M26 and Italian M26A1;
Under question - German and Italian StuG IIIG (same BR and base model, but too many differences: sideskirts/osketten, smoke grenades, add-on armor), German and Italian Leopard 1A5 (different first-order ammo rack capacity, LWS + Italian one should have a bit different hull from 1A2s, although it isn’t modelled in the game).

Didn’t Germany’s come first?

Finnish - 26 October 2022;
German - 7 March 2023;
Hungarian - 19 September 2023.
Finnish has a slightly different armor composition.

3 Likes

The idea is nice, but in my opinion, a 50% bonus on EVERYTHING is excessive, utopian! 10 to 20% is already cool.
The game involves grinding, it’s like that for all players and in all nations. Plus, it allows those who don’t have golden balls to train their crews by grinding.
In fact, always wanting to change everything to make life easier is already a bad idea. It lowers skill.
So, a 50% bonus is too much, I think.

For me, 20% MAX, only for pure C&P, as you explain in "What qualifies as a “copy-paste vehicle” under this system?", and only on RP and SL when purchasing the sponsored vehicle. There is no reason to have -50% on the RP & SL modification price, or on the cost of crew training, the crew is not c&p, it is another one so no reason.
20% is already huge, keep in mind that the bonus for the next vehicle in the tree is 10%, so let’s not overdo it.

10-20% is nothing bro, and the grind is big enough. Also you only get the boost if you already grinded the vehicle somewhere else, I don’t see why one should spend tons of time grinding what they already have somewhere else… yes the game is partly about grinding, but there’s very much enough grind to do and there still will be enough if this is added

50% is a dream. I would settle for 30% to be honest, don’t mind.

1 Like

I was thinking about a similar suggestion for soo long! A few examples: I stopped grinding france at 3.7 because I hit the Shermans, which I already played in the USA and Italy. I just couldn’t bother tho grind them. And for the M-44? I completely ignored it in the Italian tech-tree and never played it in the German tech-tree either, or Japan for that matter. Please give us a discount on the vehichle modules too…

Please please please