Yes, Remove the missile Pantsir-SM is supposed to bring to the table in the first place…
TKB-1055 has never been fitted to SM-SV however, it’s been fitted to SM/SMD.
Personally I think the latter would be the most reasonable to remove, but nothing will be.
prove it and make a bug report please.
besides the fact that missile wasn’t needed in the first place
they already have the longest line of sight missile in the game they don’t also need the fastest by a large margin
LOS missiles are not always superior to NLOS.
Now Russia has complete and utter CAS dominance and air denial capabilities; Russian CAS can score as many kills as they want while everyone who has to face them is completely handicapped. Good job, Gaijin. Kh-38s, LMUR, DLIRCM, Pantsir SM… Yeah that’s not balance.
Yes, but it’s still somewhat of an effective tank destroyer, just camp a point and you’re good if the map allows you to do so safely which most usually do. Not to mention any good spaa player would be far away from spawn as possible to be effective.
Its TD capabilities are the last of your worries. Tubes are bugged rn but just shoot the hull, its all ammo.
What the SM SV can do against tanks an actual tank can do 10x better.
i know but speed makes them better
so you take the best line of sigh missile and make it faster
its like taking the mica and giving it aim120D range
hey but don’t forget even with all that hand holding… it still gets clapped too frequently at 12.7 so I don’t think Gajins done.
The problem with LOS is that if the target breaks LOS, you can’t do anything.
NLOS like IRIS-T can still hunt them down and kill them.
Tank > SPAA yes, I just know some maps this will camp the closest capture point and have infinite ammo but at least it will only take me 3 airfield landings or 3 jets to deplete it’s ammo until it only needs to rely on the cannons haha
removing the ammo box wont do much considering 48 missiles is still more than enough for dealing with cas the whole game
If it takes 48 interceptors doesnt it give up all its actual missiles?
They should make SPAA cost scale with tanks tbh.
thats what buk is supposed to deal with or strela
basically just ask adats or the euro truck
I’m not going to waste my time proving something that won’t go anywhere.
The only publically available pictures of TKB-1055 is on Pantsir-SM and SMD, but gaijin won’t care because “SM-SV = SM therefore it can use TKB-1055.”
Strela not at all.
BUK maybe, but in its current state it struggles to get much of anything done.
Overall, I think instead of the SM-SV, they should’ve fixed BUK.
Yeah, if you go with the full 48 you give up the 95Ya6s
I think they should’ve made Buk-M3 SACLOS instead of fAkeRH, would’ve been sillier and equally as wrong.