I hate this notion on the forums. Yeah Timmy in his clickbait wants to win every game with “muh abrams” but that doesn’t mean you discredit everything US mains ask for.
2 Likes
so yeah, in a world like the real one, i would prefer to play a half-balanced game than a realistic game.
i don’t deny USA mains have actual reasons for complaining about certain things which i also agree with, but most of the time they just cry about how bad things like the Abrams are even when it has probably the best reverse in the game, a 5secs reload with Ace crew, decent armor (not the best, not the worst) and the 2nd best APFSDS in the game.
Now imagine facing F-22 Raptor in your base Su-30 or MiG-29.
it would probably be 14.7 paired with the Su-30SM2, and USA mains would still complain that Su-30SM2 is superior just cuz “it’s russian”.
they wouldn’t even admit it’s fair to make it face the Su-57 even if the Su-57 is inferior in many ways (at least irl).
F-22:
If we dont have 16.0 by then, ARB will be dead because of the severe compression.
Imagine facing nex-gen IR missiles and 5th gen fighters in your 14.0 F18 without HMD
in american english, that would translate to “hell, despair and chaos! the Raptor is balanced at 14.7! keep it at 14.7, it’s fair!”
Loud =/= correct. Most new players pick the USA. The result of this stereotype is basically a hatred for US mains on the forums, and now the anemic state of US top tier because no one takes the issues seriously.
how are you making up scenarios in your head and actually getting upset at them
1 Like
what 9k games of wt does to a mf
1 Like
i believe u can’t take seriously the issues of somebody who never knew he could change nation when he started playing the game…
fr if it wasn’t cuz i told my friend to change his nation before starting playing and SHOWED HIM via shared screen how to change nation, we would be using USA for the rest of his life.
wdym?
What I meant is if Gaijin start introducing vehicles based on their introduction dates then base model Su-30 has to face Raptor which would be total madness.
As for the game Su-57 might actually be better than F-22 due to having not fixed AESA/ additional radars on the side of fusalege, LDIRCM and 3D thrust vectoring. We also don’t know how Gaijin will model stealth for top tier so its gonna be even more shtshow if you ask me.
2 Likes
that’s why i said it was better irl, but u didn’t read that part of the reply, did u?
Very high chance for that with how the 120 is currently modeled. the su57 is actually very versatile for the wt environment with its weapons and radar kit plus the raptors limited armament wont help it
3 Likes
say thx to Gaijin for creating the fakest enviroment ever imaginated in a videogame, were short-range radar guided missiles are actually better than super long-range missiles.
Expert/ace trainings shouldn’t exist btw, by how the game’s been built, it’s just an artificial P2F set to benefit autoloaders.
there’s a reason for why loaders are TRAINED irl, it’s not the same a newbie loading his first 120mm APFSDS round than a veteran who has dominated the technique and can load the Abrams’ mouth in 3.8secs before “fatigue”.
A part of American culture is pride in one’s own nation, that and most American vehicles are favorites of many. No matter how meta Russia gets, I don’t think I’d ever play it simply because it doesn’t interest me. I’ve grinded out both Swedish and French air to rank 8, and no matter how good it is, I still enjoy playing the US more.
Most of my issues don’t relate to the Abrams aside from the incorrect turret ring (Bug report), but rather about certain limitations (no 14.7, no IR bombs, state of AIM120s, incorrect lofting of AGM-179, abysmal state of Mavericks/US CAS) and the special treatment others get (MICA seeker, fake KH-38, top tier Russian SPAA).