I made a post just on this: LMUR's AoA value is unfair
so it’s the angle that makes it biased?
Theyre basically saying the 8 fnf missiles are way more eff3ctive than 16 hellfires that arent fnf
But as I said before. ALL helicopters are guilty of being opressive and apaches having 16 hellfires they can sling at close range is quite opressive.
Again, the important part isn’t trying to match the pantsir SMSV, its to provide some sort of balance
4 Likes
It’s not the angle itself that makes it biased it’s the fact that it’s the ONLY one with this angle while others were supposed to have it first
3 Likes
- flight path makes 8 fnf more deadly then 16 :) (also the missile it self being he vs heat)
- with the mix of the new pantsir it will get even less kills and the mi28 will be protected :)
hellifres suck even close range :) Jagms don’t as much but still getting close range and not getting missiles intercepted is another
Yup, with CIWS vehicles in more trees we would definitely have way less problems with FnF helis and CAS in general
1 Like
Yeah, but granted if these kinds of vehicles have a TWS system that allows them to properly see everything at once.
If not, itll feel like the anti air cv90 where yoi have to manually lock everything
Skyguard has this, a fire test was done where it shot down several drones at once with a burst of air ammunition.
They mustve been closely packed together to destroy a group with a burst… but Ill take your word for it.
Well, whatever seconds one would define as a burst
Modern SPAA not having “TWS” is honestly a red flag as that is the baseline standard for protection against multiple targets. I would be shocked if any of the SPAA Khorne mentioned did nto have “TWS”
Both of them are basically Phalanx systems mounted on trucks, the ADAMS comes with missiles in addition to the Phalanx turret
1 Like
such as u saying Ace crew gives u 6.9secs reload in a Leopard?
u can get a ~6.8secs reload with expert crew.
says the german main that never touched a single russian tank in his life, u didn’t even play them in RB, just KV-7 in arcade as highest BR russian vehicle.
SAP-HE warhead + proper lofting mechanic, that’s why it’s so good.
it will hit the roof of a tank and overpressure it 100% of the time, which the AGM-179 can’t cuz their lofting isn’t modelled.
Yes this is real thing .
Speaking of explosives, that reminded me of how Tow-2B missiles missing the second heat charge because its apparently
Isreal as well. At least Japan gets a type 81. Isreal still has the Mahbet and the Chapperal.
no FnF, Hellfires are laser-beam guided iirc.
btw Hellfires SUCK.
- way higher BR
- 30mm cannon with APDS, in a f*cking helicopter. it’s basically a flying BTR-80A.
- LMURs are way deadlier, and actually FnF, AND they have lofting, which Hellfires (or even JAGMs) don’t have.
- better FM
- LDIRCM
1 Like
True but at least the spyder is better than the type 03.
The Skyshield seems to be another case of needing a separate radar vehicle, its mounted on a vehicle chassis, but theres no visible radar.
The mobile CIWS would work, but its on a very big and immobile platform thats meant to be stationary…
Now the ADAMS system is something thatd be super promising
1 Like