The only thing I can agree with you on.
Just sucks when you’re getting the best spaa for the nation with arguably some of the best if not the best CAS options.
1 Like
@Got_a_choppa
Considering I have zero posts anywhere in existence of me defending Russian additions… you invented fan-fiction about me.
I’ve made posts defending the Mig-29’s engine fuel consumption, and attacking Gaijin’s incorrect dry thrust fuel consumption, but that’s not an addition.
You’ve seen me defend SPAA and attack CAS, but SPAA isn’t Russian, it’s universal.
“You’re”… I’m American, so did you intend that or mean something else?
Edit cleaned up the post.
Gaijin did not account the missile’s booster drag, resulting it having insane acceleration. Because the total drag is only the sub caliber warhead, but with the thrust of that big rocket booster
3 Likes
The biggest issue I have with the fictions of bias is that it distracts from genuine issues.
Gaijin found a cool SPAA and added it.
That’s not bias, that’s just “Oooo shiny.”
Focusing on this when could instead be focusing on compression at 2.7 ground, 9.3 air, etc exists.
When LDRICM is still over-performing.
When American Abrams are still a lower BR than their competitors in other tech trees.
When we lack external fuel tanks on necessary aircraft.
When the regen steering test and implementation still hasn’t happened.
2A7V still having worse hull armor than Strv 122.
And a whole host of other real issues, rather than made up favoritism.
2 Likes
Here’s a genuine issue : play 30 10.7 GRB games against Russia, and show us how many your NATO teams won.
3 Likes
@BasherBenDawg8
I’m glad you and I are in agreement.
And I’m glad to see PyroAddict agreeing with me publicly for once.
Man ur really full of yourself. How about you read the context brother, Little info in a nutshell for you. (you don’t read what people say)
Another example of being really good at hearing only what you want to hear. I’m Sorry ur so blind to reality.
So the next best move is to make assumptions of originality based off of a word in an online message, very smart. Shows how small minded your arguments pertain to be. And then flip to writing down the furthest from the original context of what you read. You really are a troll bro. I’m not even gonna argue with someone that can’t read or stay on subject. Keep living in your little bubble 💀
15 Likes
Are you able to stay on one subject without adding side quests? Mission: impossible
3 Likes
I bet he’s very talkative irl - mostly ADHD fr
9 Likes
@BabySoEz I’m quiet in general. I’m a reader/listener, but that’s off-topic. So please stick with the topic.
PyroAddict claims Basher and I are wrong about the people present here without proof.
Time to Grind the Russian again for the new SAM. Enjoyed the Pantsir and Buk a lot.
This guy is funny .All most time he fun to post the some joke on post . lol
1 Like
Funny how Russia got the best IR spaa (strella, when other nations had chaparral and manpads), saclos spaa (pantsir), then got the best CAS (kh38 slingers and ldircm mi28nm, when ah64e and z10me ldircm didnt work), and now they go again with the best saclos spaa (which can perform better than some multi vehicle spaas). Buk its not op, but also not mediocre.
Also in sim ground it will be more f- up than it is rn. Blue team in top tier will get more unplayable.
Also another fun fact, in ground sim while blie team has roland 1, ussr has 2s6.
12 Likes
Still gives me nightmares, luckily they’re a lot easier to deal with since they’ve gone up but boy oh boy I sure do love facing a missile that can’t be decoyed at all by countermeasures and can’t be outmaneuvered by subsonic or barely supersonic platforms!
I’m still genuinely befuddled that gaijin decided to combine the 2S6 with this 2S6M1 as a modification. Genuinely makes no sense as to why they don’t split them, given they’d have separate BRs if done. Maybe I’m missing some War Thunder historical context as to why that was done at the time, but it doesn’t really suit the game now.
2 Likes
The most absurd thing about this missile is that it can retain the main PEAK speed of Aster-30 for almost its entire flight time (20+ seconds of Mach 4 speeds), while Aster’s peak velocity begins to drop off after 5 seconds. This is crudely modeled, and once again, Gaijin is nerfing Western equipment for no reason.
18 Likes
Are you just now discovering sustainer burns?
Aster-30 also features a sustainer motor but isn’t modelled as such, I guess, because screw you, that’s why 🤷♂️
6 Likes
Nope, them deciding to do it (incorrectly btw, a thing that required a few fixes in the future AFAIR) in that exact moment and more than that providing immediate substitute for it and only for 1 tech tree in the entire game - is a big, glowing red sigh with some neon arrows pointing at it.
Nope, munitions is second priority for this one. It’s made to ground all helicopters and will be very successful with it. I’ll remind that it’s the only missile that you can’t dodge by hovering low in a heli. At the same time there’s a lot of maps where you can see heli spawn from the tank spawn.
1 Like
Just one more reason to move back to matches below 10.0.
1 Like
This new AA is Very strong and was not needed at all am so confused why it was added?😭
like how am gonna even deal with K-38m and mi 28nm now?
it’s already hard to spawn a jet fighter a ground rb face these AA
2S6 / S1 / Buk / S1 SM-SV ???
double spawn with backup o.o
Top tier ground is so toxic to play and very mental unhealthy to play.
19 Likes