The Pantsir SM-SV is Simply Too Strong, Russian Bias as Clear as Day

Type 03’s issue is it can’t hit anything close range as it soars straight up in the sky as soon as it launches. And it can’t even hit targets from long range. Plus Buk can launch missiles even if the main radar vehicle gets destroyed.



Me personally, I disagree with Gaijin thinking Buk was the worst top tier SPAA, type 03 is worse than the buk.

And if they add SPAA like the new Pantsir, they should have thought about other nations’ capability of offering similar competition. Its not like they’re gonna add C-RAM for America. Essentially it looks like Russia gets an OK Buk for CAS, the best Pantsir for the best iron dome, the best CAS missile, and the best radar for their CAS. I just think that Gaijin should turn their attention to nations that are lacking in top tier and then we can move on to cool new things.

I agree, I don’t hate the new Pantsir as if I get on Russia’s team I benefit. But it still feels wrong…

1 Like

Bro is a gigantic troll that’s why

1 Like

The only thing I can agree with you on.
Just sucks when you’re getting the best spaa for the nation with arguably some of the best if not the best CAS options.

@Got_a_choppa
Considering I have zero posts anywhere in existence of me defending Russian additions… you invented fan-fiction about me.
I’ve made posts defending the Mig-29’s engine fuel consumption, and attacking Gaijin’s incorrect dry thrust fuel consumption, but that’s not an addition.

You’ve seen me defend SPAA and attack CAS, but SPAA isn’t Russian, it’s universal.

“You’re”… I’m American, so did you intend that or mean something else?

Edit cleaned up the post.

Gaijin did not account the missile’s booster drag, resulting it having insane acceleration. Because the total drag is only the sub caliber warhead, but with the thrust of that big rocket booster

The biggest issue I have with the fictions of bias is that it distracts from genuine issues.

Gaijin found a cool SPAA and added it.
That’s not bias, that’s just “Oooo shiny.”

Focusing on this when could instead be focusing on compression at 2.7 ground, 9.3 air, etc exists.
When LDRICM is still over-performing.
When American Abrams are still a lower BR than their competitors in other tech trees.
When we lack external fuel tanks on necessary aircraft.
When the regen steering test and implementation still hasn’t happened.
2A7V still having worse hull armor than Strv 122.

And a whole host of other real issues, rather than made up favoritism.

1 Like

Here’s a genuine issue : play 30 10.7 GRB games against Russia, and show us how many your NATO teams won.

We’re the ones shilling for Russia?

image

9 Likes

I wouldn’t be surprised if Choppa and I agree on most things, because that’s just the reality of conversations here.
We’re all in agreement on most things, but today we’re focusing on a non-issue SPAA for what reason exactly?

Israel doesn’t have good CAS, so this doesn’t impact them.
USA has good CAS so this impacts a bit, but spawning less CAS will result in better spawn point use.
Germany has bad CAS so this doesn’t impact them.

Like…

Just can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic or not lol, cuz I can assure you we ain’t shilling for Russia here lmao

2 Likes

@BasherBenDawg8
I’m glad you and I are in agreement.
And I’m glad to see PyroAddict agreeing with me publicly for once.

Its baffling how Alvis always finds a way to get everyone wrong.

Either its a comprehension issue or a lazy effort to derail.

7 Likes

@PyroAddict
Pyro, you do realize that Basher’s defending me… right?
Stop trying to derail the topic with nonsense.

The fact you claim Basher and I are wrong about others after admitting we’re right is hilarious.
So PyroAddict, how are Basher and I wrong?

Man ur really full of yourself. How about you read the context brother, Little info in a nutshell for you. (you don’t read what people say)

Another example of being really good at hearing only what you want to hear. I’m Sorry ur so blind to reality.

So the next best move is to make assumptions of originality based off of a word in an online message, very smart. Shows how small minded your arguments pertain to be. And then flip to writing down the furthest from the original context of what you read. You really are a troll bro. I’m not even gonna argue with someone that can’t read or stay on subject. Keep living in your little bubble 💀

2 Likes

Are you able to stay on one subject without adding side quests? Mission: impossible

I bet he’s very talkative irl - mostly ADHD fr

3 Likes

@BabySoEz I’m quiet in general. I’m a reader/listener, but that’s off-topic. So please stick with the topic.

PyroAddict claims Basher and I are wrong about the people present here without proof.

Time to Grind the Russian again for the new SAM. Enjoyed the Pantsir and Buk a lot.

As I alluded to at the start with his “takes” being well known, he might just have the highest ratio rate per post of anyone on the forums.

Don’t get me wrong, Alvis does have good takes the majority of the time, but imo when he has any “bad” ones, they tend to be quite bad… exceptionally bad at times which is what makes him well known for having “bad takes”. I believe this is one of those times lol

Anyway, going forward: I urge everyone who disagrees, and anyone those who disagrees with the people disagreeing, to please have good faith debates. Please avoid arguing or going off topic, as this thread is for discussing the new Pantsir, and if it’s too strong or not. Debates are fine, arguments are not. I have talked to Alvis and I talked and he wishes to revise some of his comments, revising the rest after he rests. After that I believe he’ll gladly engage in good faith debates, and again I encourage everyone else here to as well. Thanks!

1 Like

This guy is funny .All most time he fun to post the some joke on post . lol