No he doesn’t.
i doubt gaijin can even do that.
they can’t even give damage module for the heli blade, much less radar signature.
you can break them by hitting them with collision, but there’s nothing to damage the blade since it’s not even modeled.
Alvis, have you used the hq17 or the Tor?
4 Likes
The ragebait is insane actually.
1 Like
Rage bait or low iq, call it
7 Likes
Yeah let’s wait 9 seconds after getting an rwr ping before doing anything. also you can notch it and can quite easily roll it.
Well maybe because the herculies, hawk and patriot would all be far worse than the nasams in most scenarios? most are sarh missiles except later patriot pac variants, with some missiles having a slower top speed, they would suck at long range and only the pac 3 would have any advantage over the nasams. they are good at long range, high alt, not for warthunder
That was one of the worst top tier era. On top of it, if you remember, the Su-25SM3 and Su-34 didn’t share spawn cost. So you could spawn the two of them in quick succession without suffering from an increase in spawn cost.
I clearly remember having multiple matches back to back where the only thing killing me where KH-38, not tanks.
Again, you cannot notch this radar, this was my first game after the update so I had no idea of how fast the new pants missile is. I would’ve been alive from any other SAM in this situation
1 Like
The majority of the WT playerbase is pretty bad, which is shown by the hilarious 0.7 global average K/D.
So yeah since a lot of bad players exist of course there will also be a lot of cope posts.
There isnt much 11.7 spaa to work with tho. Also range isnt only missile parameter. Adats and roland missiles have less range but higher speed. Both launch missiles at target and not up which is better against low level pass attacks when you dont have time for your missile to cosplay icbm. US adats even has gun. Adats in general has antitank abilities. Roland missile has better g overload. And roland has smoke grenades.
While it has some advantages like range and radar tracking multiple targets, it still loses to analogs in other aspects. Wouldnt call it best tbh.
And 11.7 gets uptiered in most battles where it loses to anything else. Pantsir which sits 0.3 br higher has more range, more missiles, better missile speed, guns, better radar scan angles. And again, launches missiles straight to enemy instead of vertical launch.
I’ve spent hours against the TOR M1 to learn its weaknesses, and came out of that session learning very little.
Which is in stark contrast to the learning how to defeat everything Pantsir earlier that month.
Cause external 3D models aren’t the cockpit, engine, avionics, etc.
The radar equipped A-4s still don’t have functional radars in-game.
How many research and development points can be obtained by intercepting 70 missiles
4 Likes
100?
Intercept 68 missiles
4 Likes
Agree with all of this except for faulting brimstone. It’s a worse hellfire.
Additionally multi-vehicle SPAAs “had to be” made somewhat useless because of the tiny maps meaning that if they were accurate they would make a no-fly zone
Now I see why we finally got so many fnf bombs, because precious Russia is the only one who can now counter them.
If it wasn’t Russian no one would say anything, for so long everyone is being complaining for how strong CAS is, i am a russian main and i didn’t think Russia needed another SPAA even if the BUK wasn’t good like Sky Sabre and Mamba and other TT with biggest gaps needed more SPAAs BUT now we got it and you act like lunatic like its going to destroy CAS that’s the worst thing for me and many players that hate CAS i hope other counties get AA systems with the same capabilities so no one no more will complain about the KH38, and also just model the spikes correct and when you hit the Russian autoloader with a maverick or spike or anything else make the tank explode
Wait, interception nuke?
cant even kill the mi with my naasams lmao, i can lock on them and as soon as they hear it they dip down