Su-30SM2 is currently best top tier jet while has access to best A2G munition fired from a jet.
LMUR is also the most busted A2G munition that can one tap almost anything while bein the only AGM that has proper loft profile and its far superior compare to its counterparts.
So yeah these two also gets included to that list.
Yeah both Strv122 and Merkava 4’s was able to stop LMUR thx to their roof composite armor, sadly Gaijin changed their armor profile and made them weaker due to some questionable bug report.
Meanwhile they neglects most armor reports and acts like they don’t exist.
Lmao why should I having hard time sleeping when I have access to every nation in this game and can switch to any country whenever I want.
Even if this game makes me angry I can just close it and go back to playing Metro Exodus/ Assasin’s Creed Shadows anytime I want or go out and enjoy the life.
fixed wing CAS also has 6x the fastest AGMs in game by a very large margin
LMURs are not unreliable HEAT warhead and loft correctly unlike the rest
Pantsir S1 was the strongest AA in its time, while being on the same BR as ITO mind you
T-series, while not the best, are handheld by the caroussel not spalling and their questionnable ERA performance against APFSDS, which, btw isn’t even the latest generation for most western tanks (DM73-83, M829A4, SHARD). Got to show how terrible they are IRL i guess
Smin recently said regarding one AAM i can’t remember the name of that the external aspect of a missile compared to an other couldn’t be used for a bug report, yet that’s exactly what they did to nerf the manpads.
i mean it screams bias like never before : “the igla can not turn, so we believe the engineers designing western manpads couldn’t make them turn either, since the missiles look somewhat similar” (don’t mind the primary sources saying otherwise)
As for Pantsir SM-SV, it barely loses any speed between the moment it stops burning and the moment it self explodes at 40km. It keeps its energy better than some medium and long range SAMs (mainly the Japanese and franco-italian one), all while travelling 1700m/s in dense air and burning out quickly
Not the first time either. The devs, in fact, although not publicly (it was said to a former tech moderator), stated that the Leopard 2 series cannot achieve the armor levels seen in the Swedish Trials graphs, and I qoute;
Last time back when 2A5 came out I used these diagrams to prove the armour was incorrect even for TVM levels and he copy pasted a forum post from a NII STALI employee, Saying it was impossible etc
Basically, gaijin devs believe a random employees word over primary documentation, because said employee doesn’t think the West is capable of making a tank with 400mm more of physical armor, more armored compared to their T-series, that the West created anti-ERA rounds against.
This game is full of bias, particularly, russian one.
At some point they should accept the fact that game developer and defense engineer are 2 different jobs and that MAYBE, just MAYBE, both require different skills and knowledge bases
Do you remember the last time one tech tree had a 54.5% winrate with 35% of all games played at a BR with the only other positive tech tree having a massive 2.6% playrate?
Because i dont.
Edit: nevermind scratch that, i do remember. It was 35% playrate on a 56.7% winrate in October and the same with a 54.3% winrate in december and you wouldnt believe it but it was russia as well but at least there were some other positive trees compared to now
What a funny coincidence