The screenshots are an amazing way to show how busted the fragment count of the missiles is
You know something is wrong when every inch of a vehicle gets plastered by fragments and the fragments create a perfect silhouette of the vehicles lol
Yes
Who do they base that stats on?
I’ve been dreaming of this feature forever, long overdue imo. So many modern radar sets, and we can’t share information between planes and other friendly radars.
1 Like
Why do you feel the need to ask, if you already looked at my stats in-game?
My experience with the Spikes has been that they reliably manage to cripple tanks. Getting one-hit kills with them is a bonus, not something to rely on.
I don’t expect to get free kills with FnF missiles and neither should anyone else.
I’m not gonna get any further into this again
Spoiler
Since you already looked at my stats, you also might have realized that I’m not good in general and light vehicles relying on autocannons are the ones I am the worst at. These stats don’t show assists or which weapon got me the kills however, so you wouldn’t know if my experience with Spikes is positive either way.
Their internal stats, which most likely are just the overall stats of every player combined
imagine the F-16 40+km away from the battlefield giving targeting data to an AH64E to fire LOAL JAGMs
1 (one) aesa typhoon instantly making the entire team omniscient
Good thing Gaijin would never be able to implement complex mechanics like that
1 Like
Like 95% of those kind of pilots are playing ussr only.
Thats a simple question. Because I want to point out your incompetence. 0.5 kd players shouldnt argue in a balance related topics like this one, because you literally dont know how to play a game.
Based.
This thread isn’t even about the Spike in the first place and my personal K/D doesn’t prevent me from being able to make observations or judge how good or bad a weapon (or vehicle) is.
You can judge a weapon or vehicle without using it yourself.
For balance discussions both the experience of the users and the ones being affected by the weapon or vehicle matter.
Lol, it does.
Definitely. But only if you have enough experience with similar weapon systems or vehicles. For example, I could estimate how broken Kh-38MTs gonna be since a first glance on its statcard on a dev stream. I was right, its literally broke the game.
Great, so I am 100% able to judge the Pantsir (and the FnF ATGMs), as I have more than enough experience with other SAMs (and ATGMs)
What other SAMs do you have, just curious
Stormer HVM, ADATS, Rapier, Sky Sabre
I haven’t used the Sky Sabre much, but you don’t need to play many matches with it at all to be able to tell that it has lots of trouble dealing with helis and is very easy to counter (just like most other current top tier SAMs)
For top tier SAMs in general, having eyes should be enough to be able to tell that the systems are in a bad spot compared to the CAS they have to deal with.
My experience with the ADATS is limited to the time after 4th gen planes and the Kh-38MT became available and I am sure my stats with it reflect that.
The Stormer HVM has been my go-to SAM ever since I unlocked it and well, the Rapier is just a sad story overall.
By using free anti air spawns I’ve also used the 2S6 and OSA, which I suppose you’ll have to take my word for, because free anti air spawns don’t show up in your stats tab
oh nice, I also have the Sky Sabre and I additionally have the Pantsir SM-SV as you know and the NASAMS 3 (Norwegian one)
1 Like
Idk if you’ve had the same issue but to off topic real quick. Is it just me or has the Sky Sabre been bad half the time at intercepting munitions because I’ve experienced multiple occasions of the CAMM and CAMM-ER failing to intercept a few LMURs and a few KH-38MTs?
Nothing even remotely close to pantsir XD
Man im literally comming to the forums for ppl like you
1 Like
What would be close to the Pantsir?
Oh right, the Pantsir, great point.