The Pantsir SM-SV is Simply Too Strong, Russian Bias as Clear as Day

no, but we dont need a direct equivalent, we just need radars to not suck a**

1 Like

Closest thing in terms of filling kind of the same purpose is M-SHORAD, which is just a better LAV-AD

Not necessary, most missiles like the new pantsir and patriot turn off there proxy fuses and hit the target directly when they multi path.

That would require them to hit the helis in the first place

GPS and data link would take over, just because you fly low doesn’t make you invincible like in game.

The top tier SAMs already should have datalink and IOG

IRIS-T SLM even has GNSS on top of that
ASRAAM-ER, CAMM, Aster, FM-3000 and I-Derby-ER all are supposed to have datalink and IOG

so with some quick research about the amraam-er it travels around mach 4 to mach 5 which is about 1,300 to 1,700 m/s. This is intresting as the missle only travels 920m/s in game which is around mach 2.7 ish

Glory to gaijin and the magical russian pantsir am i right?

So howcome the new pantsir gets the fastest missle in the game when the amraam-er is really the fastest missile on paper

Because russia suffers remember? The T80BVM and BMPT arent good enough for top tier, they are the worst trust me bro… trust

also nasam goes 920mps

2 Likes

All mentions of the AMRAAM ERs speed that I can find are below 1,300 m/s
The Aster 30 is said to have a maximum speed of around 1,500 m/s

i guess bro…

sarcasm

1 Like

ik

i thought you took it literal

XD

Not really i mean we can safely assume it can go that speed since it uses the RIM-162 ESSM motor which has been confirmed to go mach 4+

There are plenty of bug reports that use the ESSM as reference and documentation regarding the ESSM as sources, but Gaijin doesn’t accept those reports

You would need documentation specifically for the AMRAAM-ER to get Gaijin to accept a report about the speed and without such a report it is unlikely that Gaijin is going to change the speed of the AMRAAM-ER

1 Like

IRIS-T has Datalink but only during the guidance phase, in the IR terminal phase, it guides on its own. I don’t even know if GNSS is properly modeled yet but Datalink is just “partially” there.

1 Like

I’m pretty sure the GNSS part currently only removes the IOG drift, just like it does on the AIM-120D

1 Like

yeah unfortunately there isn’t much info out there but my question is how they randomly chose that number without any sources