Just wanted to post this video here
I understand it’s from DCS, but the modeling of the IRIST and Pantsir S1 relatively remain the same besides some AI spoofs, but what’s more important here is the tactics and the acknolwedgment of what both systems bring to the table, especially since he utilize HARM missles in this video.
I also do want to throw out there with this video that the IRIST-SLM entered service in roughly around 2020
The Pantsir S-1 entered service in around 2010, that’s an decade older. But people will sware up and down that the Pantsir system as a whole and for what it does is too broken and everything needs to be traditional SAMS. I tend to hear a lot of arguments about Russia getting "all this new modern equipment from XXXX year, so when a nation like Germany got the IRIST-SLM, I sure didn’t hear the same arguments formulating, since they got a very, very recent piece of equipment.
Now in DCS’s case, they added the IRIST-SLM and the Pantsir S-1 at the same time, unlike WarThunder which added them years apart. One could argue that they both have equal potency in different situations.
The Patriot entered service in 1982, much older than the Pantsir S-1, but would be considered way too strong for the games current environment, despite it being a much older system. Now it doesn’t change the fact that the newer IRIST-SLM and the much older Patriot system (with upgrades overtime) are first and foremost SAM systems meant to take down aircraft and have a completely different mission from the Pantsir system that started from the 2s6.
The only similarly proposed concept of an all in one system was the concept of the Abrams AGDS which didn’t get off the drawing board.
To wrap all this up, when you look at it all from a bigger picture, the U.S attempted for a Pantsir equivalent but it didn’t happen becaue of their focus. For Russia it did happen because of their focus. From and overall standpoint, it wouldn’t matter if HARMS, or electronic warfare was presented, because it won’t stop the Pantsir systems from doing what they were designed too do, which leads to players coping and wanting to downplay it’s abilities (just because it’s Russia) and there is no 1 to 1 from anyone else. Which ironically is very bad reasoning from a gameplay standpoint or “balancing” standpoint if you must. If 2 decades pass by and the NATO doesn’t care to come up with it’s own Pantsir, is it still going to be “broken” because everyone else can’t do the same thing? This is just food for thought
I also do want to mention that adding ECM won’t change anything about the base Pantsirs capibiltiies as it can effectively fight jamming by using it’s electro-optical system. If they’re forced to turn off radars because of Anti-Radiation missles or because of targeted jamming, they can just use their long wave thermal imager (it’s alternate IR search mode) that people say they use to not alert the target they’ve been locked, whil still being able to track multiple threats.
It’s like I said before, everyone brings something different to the table, and that’s something players can’t keep getting mad over. The sam system from 2026 isn’t gonna be a Pantsir. You got the newest system and you’re still going to throw a fit because it can do something yours can’t?
Hey @BasherBenDawg8 I’d be more than happy if you took a read over this and give me some constructive feedback, you too @Flanker_Thunder & @tripod2008