Are you implying that the objective of the mode matters? It’s still me dying repeatedly.
Just because I’ve only cataloged it in one mode doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen elsewhere. just not since the report had gone live.
If it does I’ll add it too.
Oh really farming bots and battle against players is so equal i can’t even.
Nothing, and i mean NOTHING beats the PL-5EII.
Jeff rules.
Btw @tripod2008
Are push ahead and FRB part of the same process or seperate methods altogether.
They are separate, but both would fall under spatial techniques.
Is push ahead the only method implemented in game rn?
It’s not implemented at all.
The only thing that is the blanking response
1 Like
It’s currently a bit more than just “making helis usable”
And it doesn’t adress the overperforming part, or you’ll have to explain to me how 1 laser can point at 2 or 3 missiles simultaneously
Helis should also not be immune to ARH, considering multipath isn’t a thing for modern seekers, and they still don’t have the doppler return modelled from their rotor
2 Likes
What about AH-64E and Z-10. You’re just gonna ignore those?
I’m certain the Kh38 brochure does show that su-30 can carry it.
They are not really on-par with NATO aircraft in the current environment. You cannot deny that. Sure they have their own strengths, but some strengths are worth more than others. And for those valuable strengths, Russian aircraft do not have them.
Ty-90 is about one of the only good things in the Chinese tech tree, the other one would be the BA-11 that would come next update. And did helicopters in real life not carry those weapons? What point are you trying to make?
Very debatable, since information about DIRCM is often highly classified.
Gaijin is working towards adding helis with DIRCM to all trees in the future.
Ok. It makes them viable then. Helicopters are slow and cannot evade missiles as well as planes. If they did not have DIRCM, why wouldn’t I pick a CAS plane over them?
Ok Gaijin can make it so that these systems can be overwhelmed. Sure that’s good.
Then the helicopters would get destroyed and there would be no reason at all to play them.
Adjust with BR
Although Close Air Support really isn’t a thing on a modern battlefield, at least not in a plane + heli combo
Hey maybe ground RB will finally be Ground RB, who knows
It kinda is. With all the new SPAAs CAS abilities are greatly reduced. Unless nobody on your team has an SPAA, I think that CAS isn’t as big of a threat anymore.
Or make them competitive? So anyone with CAS munitions on a plane can just ditch the heli? That’s not balance, that’s not fun. Why cant you let there be a variety of aircraft with air to ground abilities that are viable to play for people to choose from?
because sim is a dead gamemode balanced like crap, su27sm is fine nowadays but the bad radar coupled with the double scan bug made it unplayable in sim. i wouldnt use sim as an example for anything considering its completely neglected.
1 Like
im sorry to diagnose you with dementia…
see the following (its from the past)
nope.it does not.
i think its most likely a 34 rather than a 30SM
then the environment is to be complained about. because yes, it favours NATO aircraft. its not the REDFOR aircraft are worse. its gaijins lackluster gameplay initiative. they make gamemodes that suck
you seriously are forgetting things…
im not complaining about BA-11, in fact i support its addition. i would even go and say give the Z-10ME 16 of the BA-11
but the LDIRCM is the issue. not the TY-90 or the BA-11
i only mentioned those weapons to point out that those 3 helis do have ways to defend themselves even without imaginary fake force fields. unlike other helis at the exact same BR without any of those three qualities (gun, missile, LDIRCM)
already proven that IRIS-T is immune to LDIRCM
yeah good luck justifying fake additions because there are many countries that dont have this feature and wont for a VERY long time
1 Like
Ok buddy but aim9x and irist are not IR, they are Imaging IR.
You just keep proving me right
3 Likes
Since when the 30G aim9m is superior to the 40G r73???
I know some people say it has better ircm, but the truth is with enough flares both missiles can be dodge, especially frontally.
Agm65 appears before russian counterparts. What about the su25 with kh38 and even mig27k? They also has decent cas armament.
Finally, yes russia does not have targeting pod ingame and irl at top tier. So only that point in ur favor. But still calling russian cas mediocre is because the guy using it just sucks.
Well, from the very beginning, the AIM-9M was superior to the R-73 because it had a better seeker. And the R-73’s overload is useless because the missile is limited in its maneuverability.
1 Like
this shit doesnt make sense at all
9Ms is one of the worst IRCCM seekers in the game, it has piss manuverability compare to everything else
it doesnt pull as much as r73 either
An invisible 9m you don’t know that’s coming, and waste flares assuming it is coming, or, R-73 that can be easily tricked with 1 flare.
Why is Sim relevant in a thread specifically tagged with GRB?