They are similar. I can’t do a 1:1 test, but even with the Mi-28’s drop in altitude from that Mi-28’s first launch, all those lofts look similar as the tested AGM-114.
maybe look at the angle that they impact at, because that is what matters and is not at all similar
No. As many said, they are correctly modeled.
Nope.
Why not 15,0?
It was ~26 degrees for the AGM-114, didn’t check the LMUR cause it could’ve just hit a roof plate and I didn’t think much of it.
LMUR normaly hits at ~40-45 degrees in game rn
which is not at all the same
They can
but they just don’t
and you just can’t get force their mouth to explain or risk getting you know “suspend”
about this game engine yes it old need upgarde.
LMUR don’t need to be remove but instead
correct other FnF missile make it perform like it should problem should be solved
then I remember that Gaijin is incompetent they won’t do such thing unless we force them to.
Are you missing your frontal lobe? 💀
Can we all just agree that the LMUR missiles are absolutely broken right now? And no, I’m not talking about the missiles being bugged - @TPS_Hydra
Because it wouldn’t be able to queue with players who don’t use the Mi-28NM, a BR of 13.7 would still allow it to face against players not playing the USSR as the current highest BR vehicle in GRB is 12.7 (13.0*).
Gaijin should’ve honestly never added F&F missiles for helicopters and fixed-wing aircrafts, sure it’s realistic (for Western teams at least, Russia can’t produce anything for sh*t) but we’re playing a game at the end of the day, balance should ALWAYS be priority.
Also pretty funny how Russian helicopters at top tier have always been a balancing issue, call it pattern recognition
I mean sure that i agreed but what can we say or do? It already in the game now and they will not remove them that for sure
instead, all we can do is trying to convince gaijin to make other missile the correct capability that they should at least other can have similar capability not just God damn Russia that have highest capability (but such incompetent as them maybe language of force is the only language they understand)
1 Like
maybe we should make a bug report to reduce LMUR impact angle based on “game convention”
because it obviously is a game convention for everyone elses missiles to not loft correctly
1 Like
Highest GRB BR is 13.0
I do agree that lofting needs better code in War Thunder, and I’m hoping they’re working on that.
Widely regarded = 5-10 people crying about something on the platform basically made for crying
I think you should find a better argument than that. This forum is known to produce awful takes en masse, just take a look at the thread about BR changes.
I’m not sharing my opinion, I’m sharing stats from who knows how many players that played the vehicle, but I guess some views can’t be changed.
If we got 13.0 for helicopters, then some of the current 12.3 could stay there and definitely benefit from that decompression, which is something needed across the board anyways.
So the 50m/s speed boost over ItO made it so dominant ?
Heh heh I respect your idea but I’m afraid that the answer you’re going to get is “not a bug”
not going to stop you from trying or anything i appreciate anyone who do that but most of the time i feel like it rarely going to bring better result.
That statement was made with it’s ability to kill tanks in mind, so it’s not shit.
And ?
China is still a minor nation so comparing stats between the two is not a good idea.
yeah unfortunately probably would do nothing
because with how they are ignoring the bug reports on missile lofting they are definitely not going to change anything
1 Like
unless we do like Chinese that stop Thai VT-4 (one thing I respect Chinese commu about it they unite and fight back)
language of force but that need lot of people doing so but overall trying to do anything apart from it is wasting time.
You aren’t about to say the ITO/Flarakrad is better than the pantsir now
idk he might, this is the same guy who a while ago was trying to say ADATS was better than pantsir, even before it could lock from third person view