regarding spikes ? First not hitting based on RNG, retested them on Vilkas, and it just randomly choses where it goes instead of consistantly aiming where it should aim at (the top of the turret)
Regarding russian vehicles ? Well i’m not going to remake the whole APFSDS anti ERA-tip thing, i think some already went through the trouble. Hint, there’s a reason other european nations decided to upscale their firepower AFTER the T-14 went out.
Or not having some kind of magic side ERA could also help, because i can’t really make sense of what i’m seeing here :
Where exactly did someone catch me again? Im pretty sure at this point that youre not understanding 90% of whats talked about in this thread, whether thats intentionally or not remains to be seen.
Bias relates to a preferential treatment, not overall dominance.
When reasonable people refer to a gaijin bias towards russia, they are referring to the preferential treatment that’s evident amongst high tier russian equipment (in terms of their addition, bug reporting and exceedingly rare nerfs)
Too bad that we are drowned out by the hordes of shit players screaming russia bias because they died to a T-80 and refuse to hold themselves accountable for making a mistake
Just because I do somehow make it work doesn’t mean it better
There aren’t no ways BN better than BVM and definitely not better 122B+ even I manage to make K/D on BN better than 122B+ I wouldn’t dare to say BN is better.
that can be said for a lot of nations… First (not the best) heli with FnF missile for Germany, APS for Birtain (before any other major nation), First LGBU for Britain in the TT (before US - they invented them), First Spike missile carrier for Germany (before Israel) and may other… Yes Russia has its fair share of such addition to, but no more commen then other nations.
He’s a Russian Main - trying to convince them that their toys might be a teeny, tiny bit favoured by the Snail is like trying to extract blood from a stone.
The conversation in those threads mirror the narative in a certain (western) hemisphere… if you dont agree with us, you’re russian-something something…
No you guys just seem to be completely incapable of making a single concise well thought out argument when you are presented with one. Instead you resort to whataboutism, bad faith arguments and stat shaming.
Or stuff like that. Empty phrases without substance or arguments. You just seem entirely incapable of making a single argument or generally following a discussion. Its absolutely telling that none of you were able to give an actual counterargument to my initial comment and instead fled into complaining about my definition of russian bias
So we are just ignoring that part and everything that came after? Like i said, feel free to make an actual concise argument but you can keep your one liners to yourself
