Why ,will you get me another ban ?
I pointed just few vehicles that can OHK Maus and you come back with same ol same ol.
You think we are idiots ,fact.
Why ,will you get me another ban ?
I pointed just few vehicles that can OHK Maus and you come back with same ol same ol.
You think we are idiots ,fact.
@Pecanin Your post is once again accusing everyone of an insult.
Please stop demeaning everyone here with such insults.
The only way to OHK a Maus is a side shot into its ammo.
Turret angling prevents most shots.
And I think everyone on the forum is valuable and with knowledge; always have always will.
Bruh i legit just showed a screen shot of it penning a ANGLED turret.
I mean, granted you have to be like under 400 meters… But you’re not wrong about it being able to be penned
You mean this one with the turret non-angled?
Look at the angle the shell is going in… Dumbass.
@Heavytanker1945 Those that resort to insults can be dismissed without evidence.
Tho here’s evidence none-the-less:
2.There isn’t one person on these forums that i have insulted in any way.
More posts with insults.
Funny that I come to defend the Maus, with evidence, and people espouse nothing but insults.
Its about time someone put your ass in its place. you are the most annoying little shit on these forms.
This is your argument …at 41 degrees …Lolz ,just lolz
Nobody has insulted you
You chose to interpret our posts that point that you are wrong as insults
That is your personal interpretation since as i said your ego cannot accept that you are wrong ,like on most things.
I get Russians hate me cause I defend NATO all the time, and provide evidence, while posting popular English-speaking takes most of the time… but this is ridiculous.
People wanting to cut me down cause I defend Germany? lol
Your posts derailing the topic just cause my posts defend the Maus…
“Heavy tank’s should be hard to kill frontally, to encourage people to flank and do things other than blindly rush forward.” Oh look, one of my takes.
Your screenshot was barely angled.
And that should invalidate the conversation.
Should I post Your comments filled with hatred and no reason from this and old forum?
Or are we finally going to act like grown ups who don’t talk based on feelings
Hatred of anyone ruins your credibility.
ULQ_LOVER? I disagree with him on a dozen or so things; but he is a good person regardless.
Lmao.
No one has to stalk anyone to see Your comments in this and old forum.
Ah yes. The paper Maus. Easily penetratable by shooting it under the perfect condition in the weakest part of the armor.
Look at this damage:
All the tanks you just stated can be OHK’d easily by maus too.
Maus armour is very good against conventional shells (other than HE), while modern shells like HEATFS / APDS will not 1-shot kill it unless you hit the ammo (which are stored on the sides of the maus).
It’s fine at 7.7, as it shouldn’t go any lower and face stuff that can’t even pen it anywhere (like 76 jumbo), and it shouldn’t go any higher (Object 279 exists at 9.0, for example).
I was responding to bullshit claims that Maus is too OP and cant be penned by tanks facing it .
BTW it can be penned FRONTALLY by all tanks i listed ,no need for side shots.