The Leclerc is in dire need of a buff

Wait, what are they planning? is 7.0-7.7 about to be killed?

1 Like

Wdym midtier France nuke?

@HielHortler @LETHALWEAPONRAC_1

1 Like

1697564786334473

SHARD is far superior to DM73

To have a dead loader, you need to be penned.

Honestly, it’s difficult to know it since we don’t know neither the diameter nor the total length of the penetrator.

I don’t see SHARD being implemented without that data.

Edit: Meanwhile, there no issues regarding the implementation of DM73 (faster DM53) and M829A3 (patent link: US8985026B2 - Penetrator round assembly - Google Patents)

Obj906 should be 9.0

Top BRs by absolute number of nukes:

Top BRs by average amount of nukes per Battle:

Well yeah, all that your graphs are saying is that the lorraine 40t, Somua SM, AMX 50 TOA 100 and AMX 50 surbaissé are beasts. Those are the vehicles that brings me the most nukes. But the Char 25t was already the worst among the 7.7 lineup. It used to be somewhat balanced at 7.3 with a slower reload. At 7.7 with a 4s reload, it’s not a good vehicle, and it definitely won’t be better at 8.0. I already stopped bringing it in my 7.7 lineup preferring even 6.7 or 7.0 vehicles like the AUF1, AMX 13 SS11 and other.
The char 25t is currently falling in that negative feedback loop where it goes up in br, so fewer (and overall better) player play it, so it goes up in br, so fewer players play it… Exactly like what brought the Lorraine 40t economy to 24K SL for repair back in the days

1 Like

2000th comment, still not fixed

7 Likes

tbh I am making really good games with the 25t in 7.7 , 7.3 would be better , but I think it’s fine in 7.7 ,
but 8.0 ??? I think I am gonna take a break with the game if they really makes these changes

1 Like

you will see more paper tanks there

Is the Leclerc still oversized in game? Compared to real life.

It didn’t change, and even if it was bigger then by only about 10cm. By measuring the tank in CDK it was confirmed to be accurate to real life, people just came to the wrong conclusion when comparing it to another tank

1 Like

The challenger 2 had a recent dev blog to help address the issues with the vehicle, the abrams got one prior to that… I think it’s only fair the leclerc’s get the same level of attention by the devs with the long list of bug reports on the vehicle.

2 Likes

Considering how gaijin apparently misrepresented some of the bug reports in that Challenger dev blog, I’m really not sure such a blog post for the Leclerc is something I want to see honestly.

2 Likes

Why… You don’t want to be disappointed like the rest of us? Lol

At least they will tell us directly that they don’t see any problem with the Leclercs and/or that they don’t have enought information about it. No need to sugarcoat it. Then, we can stop having expectatives and rest assured nothing’s going to change.
That, or they admit several thingss are wrong and they’re on track to fix them. Depends on your optimism.

1 Like

25T and TO90 might recieve a vertical stab. https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/wmA80sxrbzgo

Penetration would still be an issue at 8.0, but this would help them both immensely against other stabilized tanks.

1 Like