The Leclerc is in dire need of a buff

Machinery of War Discussion Ground Vehicle
1840

SOURCES & COVERS ATTACHED :

1.1: An Outstanding MBT, Military Technology 24.9 (2000): 43-8. ProQuest. Web. 22 Jan. 2020

1.2: Biblioteka Magazynu, AMX Leclerc, 2001

1.3: Foreign Military Review, Issue 2, 1995

1.4: International Defense Review, Vol. 20, Iss. 6, 1987

1.5: International Defense Review, Vol. 22, Iss. 10, 1989

1.6: Jane’s Armour and Artillery 2005-06, Tony Cullen and Christopher F. Foss, Jane’s Yearbooks, Jane’s Information Group, p. 24 - ISBN 10 071062686X

1.7: JPRS Report, Central Eurasia. Military affairs, 1995, p. 103

1.8: Military Technology, Issue 9, Vol. XIV, 1990

1.9: TahkoMacptep, Iss. 2-3, 1998

1.10: The World’s most powerful tanks, M. Haskew, p. 206

This are all the sources i used, Marc Chassilian is considered as a second source, just like those source i used.

1 Like
1841

Maybe the devs want war with us haha

1842

All 120mm Abrams have a faster reload then Leclerc now…

I can’t stress how more shit this makes Leclercs.

An Abrams with an expert crew can now reliably out-reload a Leclerc.

Gaijin is fucking laughing at us.

8 Likes
1843

That’s totally it , We mustn’t give up and piss them off with the Leclercs

1 Like
1844

if I have to piss off the developers every day with well I will

1 Like
1845

We’d need to collectively throw matches pretty much at this point. Which is easier said than done.
They’re likely to use the excuse that the Leclerc still has a high win rate even if they start conceding on reports.

None of the devs even want to discuss the Leclerc’s problems. They just say that their sources are correct and don’t let it go any further. They’re completely uninterested in working with us so we can help them improve their game.

1 Like
1846

We mustn’t give up especially with the work that @WaretaGarasu to be sure

1847

I’m about ready to go back into Hibernation at the very least. This entire process has been exhausting and spoils the entire game for me.

Sure, we shouldn’t give up. But we can’t keep throwing ourselves at the wall that is the Gaijin development team and expect a different outcome. Which to be honest, this is just a video game that they want us to spend money on. I have real life to prioritize, instead of putting more and more time into this.

2 Likes
1848

I understand you

1849

I’m laughing too cause I switched to the US because they had an IFV in their lineup now they reload faster than my Leclercs. Astounding that the only French IFV (ignoring the SPAA “IFV”) remains a premium and now on top of that my firepower advantage is gone.

4 Likes
1850

Man do I long for the VCI, VBCI 2 w/ T40, and EBRC Jaguar 😩

…and side note, ERC 90 Sagaie 🤙

4 Likes
1851

we all want developers to buff other nations that are left abandoned

3 Likes
1852

I wouldn’t call the 4000 a meta defining vehicle. With those very limited range magics, you’re really going to go from target to target, hoping that you can launch even one of them. The chaos of 16v16 really benefits cheeky long range missile shots. The 4000 is really only useful by the endgame when actual dogfights happen, and that very rarely happens when both team consists of Su-27s and F-15s that kill each other from 12 km away in the first 90 seconds of the match…

1853

Unfortunately, I have seen that the Leclerc has not improved. I had a quick question, has the subject of the galix system ever been discussed with the devs?

1854

No, nothing has improved on the tank, we don’t expose the problems but no response from the devs, they are blind, and for the system you’re talking about, I couldn’t tell you

1855

And to think that I switched from world of tank to War thunder thinking that gajins were more attuned than wargaming

1856

Abrams: better reload, better armor, better survivability, best round in the game, probably spall liners in next patch. Leclerc: bruh

9 Likes
1857

A good way that’s been used to describe it is that Warthunder is one of the best games with one of the worst developers.
Gaijin has only done the bare minimum to prevent hemorrhaging instead of actually fostering the development of the game and community.

One thing that came to mind with the recent situation is that of all things, this all happened immediately after they asked us to nominate them for “Labor of Love” in the Steam awards. This all feels like a continuous descent into a sick joke.

8 Likes
1858

World of tank is a shooter and period. No realism, they were to add non-existent tanks. And developers are like Gajin “can’t have” or “go to the forum for recommendations” but War thunder is a very nice game

1860

Better reload? Yes

Better armor? Depends.

Better survivability? Due to having more crew and not nuclear fuel tanks also yes.

Best round? Hell no, that goes to DM53.

İf you wanna complain about something you should complain about Strv122’s and Leopard2A7V, not Abrams.

Even without Click Bait it was terrible.

İ researched both M1A2 and SEP couple weeks ago and they have worst wr in my service record thx to AIM players.