The Leclerc is in dire need of a buff

This is turning into a sick joke again…
We’re giving them evidence that could have France become competitive, but as usual they’re closing their eyes and ears and stomping their feet as loud as they can just so they don’t have to acknowledge anything.
Are they giving France any more competitive top tier vehicles? No? So they’re more then fine with seeing the French tech tree slowly die off because they can’t be bothered with it anymore it seems.
Because we’ve got a painfully average to bad tank. Where the M1 of all things can now have a faster reload, which adds onto the lack of competitive firepower and defensive armor.
They’re excuse being some barely defined citation that says that the standard reload is 6 seconds. It can be bypassed to make it 5 seconds, 4.2 if it had too. Which is the reason the Type 10 has such a fast reload to begin with.
But we keep getting people resistant to a buff to the Leclerc. Like, “Oh, the Leclerc has 600mm in this specific and small spot” or “6 second reload is still one of the fastest reloads in the game.” as if keeping the tank below average is doing anyone any favors for being competitive. The Leclerc keeps getting power crept and no one gives a shit, meanwhile the Leclerc has nothing to make it stand out. The Type 10 and Ariete excel enough in certain areas even if they still underperform overall. The only thing the Leclerc has is above average mobility, which isn’t even that good as other vehicles are close to it and mobility alone doesn’t carry a Main Battle Tank. So the Leclerc is still condemned as the Light tank dressed as a MBT and we’re told that’s enough for us to be happy with.

We got the Mirage 4000, big deal. That just proves that they see France as only an air tree at this point.

9 Likes

TrickZZter needs to go. This guy is so toxic

1 Like

How about this tank for France and Germany instead since Leclerc not gonna get fix anyway

5 Likes

Oh I am convinced when I saw the buffs on Abrams in today’s patch. Vehicles that have a lot of users or that moderators like can easily get buffs, but vehicles that have few users or that moderators don’t like won’t get buffs anytime soon.
I’m so disappointed.

3 Likes

Watch as it’s only given to Germany because they’re the ones leading development.

He did nothing wrong, he just forwarded what the devs said, stop going against him.

2 Likes

Mirage 2000 5F, Tiger HAD Mk.2, Mirage 4000 and the resolution of the SPAA gap. It was a great year for France all things considered, maybe the next they will focus on top tier ground

Entire dev team needs to go. Any new developer off the street will likely be better at this point.

1 Like

Meanwhile we only got the Mirage 4000 when Rank VIII ground was introduced. So we only got 3 competitive top tier air vehicles this year? Which even that’s a bit of a stretch. So far the Mirage 4000 seems to be the only meta defining vehicle. It’s still not a good excuse for everything else that has been happening.
That’s still embarrassing compared to everything else that has been getting asked for.

1 Like

So Abrams gets a buff out of the blue and Leclerc, the worst MBT, don’t because “reasons” ? When will the freaking circus sh** show end Gaijin ?

One must imagine French player happy

1 Like

We got turret rotation speed.

Still not enough for Leclerc to be on par with other MBT.

No, we’re missing spall liners and a capable round. Since so much has been said about OFL 120 F2 being on par with the F1 I think the solution is to implement the SHARD and let us lolpen.

3 Likes

So far we’ve had armor and firepower changes denied because of arbitrary reasons. They can’t even give a good excuse at this point, they’re just using anything to refuse the changes.
If they said that they acknowledged the report but said that they don’t think the Leclerc needs a drastic buff, the situation would at least be slightly better. But instead they’re saying everything we give them is wrong.

The only problem is that SHARD is exclusive to the XLR, which won’t fix the problems the Leclerc has.

4 Likes

They will argue that Shard is too recent to be added, will generously give us another C&P with the same flaws instead. We will get a new 600+ mm pen round once there is 700+ mm pen for other nations.

DM53 is easier to implement, for SHARD Mk.1 someone needs to make a “bug” report about it.

Buffing M1 series’ reload is gaijin basically saying: the click bait sale was not that great. Need more money

2 Likes

when are the developers going to face reality seriously, they are making fun of us by telling us we need documents etc. we provide them with all the proof but they don’t want to listen to their community when they say that there is a problem that’s is that it woke you up the developers have the force more people are going to play the rest of the nations because the work is so sloppy it’s crazy to be so blind as that what do they want as proof of the confidential files to see that it are wrong???

3 Likes

It’s more of an issue as they may use it as an excuse to not model spall liners to Abrams