Yeah, im not sure about that too lol
We have received MP from Smin telling us what they did not want to accept. Basically to much speculation (which we are working on), and they absolutely don’t want a single Russian source, even if it’s to confirm information given by other sources.
So for now it’s just back to trying to push for mobility and firepower.
We already have an idea of what it’s supposed to be, we just need to replace the Russian sources. Which is easier said than done.
I’m pretty sure there is something wrong with the belly fuel tanks, yet devs keeps denying it. Yesterday, i had yet another Fuel tank explosion, this time caused by a single spall :
On this death, i took minimal dmg, the fuel tanks didn’t even turned red, yet it exploded. This always happens with belly tanks, not the side ones, once struck = instant death. Do someone has the same issue ?
Seems like the Abrams got it’s reload buffed to 5 seconds
Lol this has to be a joke
Losing it as we speak
Hi @TrickZZter . I don’t want to push for a putsch or anything like that.
However, I find it very stupid of you guys that you consider 1 source, even from a respected GIAT engineer, be better than 13 sources including video evidences. Especially when it’s about something as easily seen on video as reload rate.
We can obviously expect that some informations given by Marc Chassillan to be wrong, by mistake or to respect some NDA. I have a lot of respect for that guy, but I find it strange that you take everything he says at face value, especially when we give you such overwhelming evidence (including 3 videos). Just look at the fact that he says 6 shots a minute when moving. That has to be incorrect…
And I am even more annoyed considering the M1 are getting a 5s reload, which is stupid considering the balancing of the game. There’s not a single day where anyone playing both the Leclerc and the M1 would consider that the M1 needed a reload buff more than the Leclerc.
EDIT : also, if you consider the numbers on this page to be reliable, be ready to give the Leclerc +18 degrees in elevation, which you still have not done.
Leclerc remains the 4th fastest reloading [without spending GE] tank at top BR instead of the 3rd.
I’d prefer its armor corrected, as per my early posts in this topic.
Expect that many tanks can reach that value with crew skills, including the 2A7 which is sharing the best MBT rank with the T90M. And their spall liner makes them extremely likely to keep that reload rate even after being penetrsted
If you read my entire post you’d see the brackets [without spending GE].
And spall liners will come to more tanks.
You don’t need to spend GE for ace crew
Frankly, it’s ridiculous. A video showing the Leclerc firing non-stop is better proof than even an expert’s words. The evidence is there for everyone to see. Fortunately, Marc Chassillian didn’t say it reloaded in 7 seconds…
And here it comes the fun
This part is from the same Author, he does says the armor got improved overall while retaining the same book, which obviously can’t be used as a source because it does not have number according to Gaijin standards. So, since they trust this Author that much because the armor is not better on it excluding the block on the gunner section?
Autoloader section, from the same Author,
Does not talk minimally about the reload time, so at the end its just a number at the end of the book, so why this dismissed all the 10+3 sources sent?
Devs hard at work making sure the Leclerc stays the weakiest Top tier MBT.
leclerc is worst 11.7 mbt
need new APFSDS and reload speed buff
Ariete, Merkava*
The ariete and merkava at least have better firepower and LWS.
and not explode fuel tank