That’s a good idea tbh
Dont you know? Alvis is Razer.
He’s just changed his nickname thats all.
2 Likes
Really ?😅🤣🤣🤣
Yup.
1 Like
are any of your other reports still open
Here’s the thing right. We know what we need for armor reports with the current standards: Numbers.
Relative improvement numbers, exact numbers, relative numbers using ammo, etc.
Nothing is stopping me from going to a museum and measuring Abrams roof armor for example.
Finding documents however is a challenge, especially French docs.
Since we know what we need, we can figure out methods to get that information legally.
@fergui3101
Yeah, Alvis sounds softer than Razer from Jak & Daxter.
No. The report about the reload got accepted some minutes ago. Now im waiting for my last one to get approved. Leclerc MBTs acceleration & turning rate are too low // Gaijin.net // Issues
10 Likes
Regenerative steering would be nice.
3 Likes
It was acknowledged, lets pray for it to be fixed
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/R0xYIxujmb8M
1 Like
The closest we have to relatively close numbers not in Russian is that it can be penetrated by 9M133.
You would think it would then be correlated to the data in Russian by I guess not.
In reality, you say that, but it’s not even up to us to provide this information (which is moreover “classified”). We have too normalized the work and the ability of the War Thunder community to provide information to developers to improve the game. But in what other game do we see this with a development team equivalent to Gaijin’s? Is it their game or ours? I agree, it’s important for consumers to share their opinions & feelings about the game so that developers can correct it. But here it’s THE COMMUNITY that’s doing THEIR job, FOR FREE, and THEY are blatantly SHITTING on us. It’s SHAMEFUL, I’ve never seen anything like it in my life
Edit : I’m a bit on edge because of the news
9 Likes
I think we should focus on mobility, fire control and firepower buff/fixes. Trying to rework the armor is a pointless enterprise for one reason: All public records about the Leclercs (Sweden, Greece, UK and Turkey) point at the tank being unarmored in relation to other market options (Ex. Leopard 2).
1 Like
I remember that the only reason Type 10 got its armor is cause of a test Japan did using its own round to make Type 10 resistant.
The problem is thag those records were made before the Leclerc even entered service.
İ feel your frustration.
On the old Forum i stated multiple times that community is the one who actually gets the job done.
Because as you said we’re provıding more information then actual developers in this case.
1 Like
Smin himself is the cherry that proves that they don’t give a shit if service is different from early production. We already got a hint from David Bowie.
1 Like
if at least the mobility report goes through we can play it more like a light tank which would be the next best scenario since armor is getting denied
Yes, exactly. And I would also like to point out the fact that THEY are asking us for tangible evidence (classified documents or nothing), which is all well and good for a game that aims to be realistic, but I would really like to see their own sources for each patch
I don’t feel like we should drop everything about the armor, their point is just dumb.
i mean smin is just a messenger but this stuff is so hard to communicate that it doesn’t really matter to try at times
no but they wont even change the azur to composite and that tells me plenty about what they think about armor reports