Gaijin needs to rethink how they develop changes for top tier or it’s going to become a graveyard dedicated players will avoid. They’ve refuse information that we provide because it’s not up to their insane standards and give a nonsensical excuse. France is becoming not worth to time to grind through as the Leclerc is painfully average by itself and there aren’t any other meaningful additions.
Now with features that we know exist but again can’t give irrefutable primary source proof they’re just going to ignore the obvious problems. The way they’re committed to developing the game makes me want to play it less, it’s just not a fun experience.
You know whats the most funny part about this situation?
They are the one who keeps telling classified documents should not be published under any circumstances while asking proper sources which is equal to getting classified documents in the first place.
İ mean cmon Gaijin how the hell are we suppose to find exact protection Numbers without getting our hands on classified sources?
I think they’re figuring something to do.
Cause relying on the most recently declassified armor material for tanks is causing issues even if it’s fair & unbiased to do that.
Here’s the thing right. We know what we need for armor reports with the current standards: Numbers.
Relative improvement numbers, exact numbers, relative numbers using ammo, etc.
Nothing is stopping me from going to a museum and measuring Abrams roof armor for example.
Finding documents however is a challenge, especially French docs.
Since we know what we need, we can figure out methods to get that information legally.
@fergui3101
Yeah, Alvis sounds softer than Razer from Jak & Daxter.
The closest we have to relatively close numbers not in Russian is that it can be penetrated by 9M133.
You would think it would then be correlated to the data in Russian by I guess not.
I think we should focus on mobility, fire control and firepower buff/fixes. Trying to rework the armor is a pointless enterprise for one reason: All public records about the Leclercs (Sweden, Greece, UK and Turkey) point at the tank being unarmored in relation to other market options (Ex. Leopard 2).