The Leclerc is in dire need of a buff

There are many parts to consider in the effectiveness in performance. But it’s easily safe to assume it won’t perform worse then DM53.
What statistics are you even pulling from?

1 Like

I mean even if Leclerc S1’s armor isn’t fixed (which I find totally understandable if they really want to stick with the Swedish trials) why tf aren’t they fixing the rest!?

4 Likes

I would love to see the Euro MBT for France (and Germany a patch later) so they can get some hull armour.

Spoiler

8 Likes

Report about incorrect reload for all Leclercs
Leclerc ( All Variants ) wrong rate of fire // Gaijin.net // Issues

9 Likes

I just noticed that. This is completely asinine.

@Smin1080p
Explain. The Swedish trials being held over our heads to explain why we get to have one of the worst armor values is getting infuriating.
We can confirm that the armor can be penetrated by 9M133, 1,100mm CE protection that we’re asking for is within that.

5 Likes

This is so infuriating. I don’t understand how they continue to rely on armor values from the early Leclerc from what, 30 years ago? There’s only so much for sources we can do since its all classified and the current sources are probably the best that will come to fruition unless documentation from the UAE surfaces (unclassified). The French community has done a superb job on trying to provide information from what is available for developers to correct this based on what’s available. I respect Gaijin’s “semi-strive” for authenticity but there’s LITERALLY only so much information we can legally obtain and there needs to be a balance on values from public information.

9 Likes

I’m glad someone made a report, but aren’t the reloads a balancing decision and not due to realism?

2 Likes

İ dont.

They’re just using this lame excuse in order not to buff Leclerc series,Leopard2A7V and M1 Abrams.

This so called Swedish trials has been done 30 years ago and to think Gaijin claims neither Usa,France or Germany didnt improved armor protection on their tanks in 30 fking years.

This is disgusting,twisted and deepsiet excuse from developers who thinks only mother Russia can produce better tanks in time while in reality those T series are nothing but a trash.

İm done with them.

3 Likes

Then why does the Type 10 have a 4 second reload? Why does the CV90120 have a 5 second reload? They are both minor nation vehicles so why are their reloads so vastly better?

Because screw France apparently

2 Likes

I quoted “Semi-strive” because half the time it seems half-a**ed

Dont get me wrong i understand what you’re meaning, my frustration comes from developers.

For the same reason they rely on all other declassified armor from 30 years ago.
40 years in the case of T-90M’s hull.

@Panther2995
I get that 2A7V & Strv 122B are superior to every Russian tank in WT, but that doesn’t make them Russian themselves.

Ive lost all hope for most of france lately just feels forgotten they keep a lot of reports open for “balance” and then proceed to add the change when its already power crept several times over

2 Likes

Same.

They are purposely ignoring Leclerc’s problem while making lame excuses.

Honestly apart from turret rotation buff i dont expect any changes for Leclerc in upcoming 2 years.

3 Likes

Is there a bug report about the titanium plates missing on the SXXI?

İt is.

They told us its not a feature for now.

Can you believe it?

1 Like

Unbelievable…

İ wasnt surprised when i saw the answer from developers considering they are purposely ignoring 90 percent of Leclerc’s problems.

3 Likes