if you ever need a technical drawing of the camo CCE paterne. Mobius had shared one.
If Mobius managed to find this documentation but the devs didn’t (did they really look for it anyway?) that just proves how lazy the devs are…
I litteraly did a suggestion post for the CCE cammo a month ago, I received an email telling me it was approved and never saw my post again… Is this like a big joke?
Edit: Btw my post is gone… I can’t find it anywhere
1 Like
Hope yours won’t be deleted after being approved
That’s what annoys me the most, they make bug reports and when they’re approved they don’t follow up. I made a bug report on ARL 44, it was reported but no news, I don’t know if the devs consider it a bug, if they’re going to fix it (not necessarily right away but if it’s planned), in short, they’re doing the devs’ job but we don’t know what happens next.
2 Likes
Mine wasn’t a bug report it was a suggestion post on the forum so I don’t see any reason why I can’t find it anymore… Moreover, I can’t even see it in my draft too… so basically, all the time I spend doing it is gone for absolutly no understanble reasons…
1 Like
Hopefully mine gets accepted
1 Like
That’s the problem ! Mine was accepted and just disappeared !
was that the one where there turret was modelled totally wrong ?
1 Like
No, I’m the one for the inclination of the upper front plate which is 42° IRL and not 48° as on WT.
2 Likes
I meant t14 as even with strv122 with a better shell isnt enough apparently to give leclercs anything new since 2019.
1 Like
Ahhh my mistake i was thinking of the ARL-44
Me seeing a lot of activity and getting hopeful about possible changes only to find a gigantic clusterfuck
Sure, but you’re also underestimating the added survivability of having a 4th crew member. It’s far easier to one shot a Leclerc, Type 90 or Type 10 than a Leopard or an Abrams.
If you had images attached, make sure to check their extension. The bug tracker is incredibly picky with what it’ll accept. I kept getting errors while trying to make one, and the pictures were the issues.
5 Likes
Leclerc reload might be a dead end based on the right most book here.
It claims that 6 seconds is the reload.
Don’t shoot the messenger, I’m not posting my opinion on this.
4 Likes
A Rally car could explode when pushed to the rev limit… However if you wanna win you’ll push those limits… 5 second reload please. It says it’s capable… I doesn’t state for how long until it fails XD there’s no crew fatigue with manual loading of a full abrams rack 5 second reload plez lol
2 Likes
It says it was capable, however it was reduced to 6 seconds with no indication the decision can be reversed in the field.
It states it WAS capable… So at the very least a leclerc prototype vehicle should get the 5 second reload lol
It should have the 6 second reload since it was the speed used, this can be compensated by giving a better shell as exchange, SHARD for example would be better than everything right now and that would make it have an edge.
Although, prototype Leclerc will surely get 5 second reload if not even less since they lack any armor basically on the autoloader almost.
3 Likes
Afaik Leclercs can also do some “emergency shot” about something like 3 or 4s.
Sure can broke some things, but IF they can, would be nice to have. Since Gaijin start to use “they can so we add that”. And it’s not like they model mechanical failure ingame or Tigers and Panther should have the transmission who broke every 100meter, and the engine taking fire like that :p
5 Likes
I’m happy that France now has a really good helicopter at least.
4 Likes
Good top heli (and better are ready for the future with for example Tigre MkIII with Akeron LP (Take the spike, add a little more speed, and range up to 20km, nasty))
Good CAS with Mirage -5F (even if not it’s job irl but anyway…)
Good MBTs that would just need some unerf to follow the others nations.
Just need some light/support/reco with them. And need BIG works on the navy x)
5 Likes