Just copy it with all sources and whatevery you got and post it every now and then. At some point you’ll get to someone who’s competent and willing enough. It’s an ongoing issue but sadly there isn’t much we can do about it. I’m already starting to collect such cases as the double standards with Leclerc to STRV 122 in your case. When I got enough together I’ll try to forward them to Gaijin in hopes to get things straight.
Lets see im still waiting for a response as you can see on the bug report
Yeah I’m following it. Still have some hope. Then again I’m very annoyed about these people as they’re not even supposed to decide if the information is sufficient enough or not. That’s still the devs work and specifically with things like brochures they should get forwarded to get looked at one way or another by a dev to decide.
5 Likes
I hope we get some info about the leopard 2a5+ wedges
In the current conflict
Some sources say the wedges make rounds less than 1000mm long practically useless
Becouse they will hit the main armor side on
Which I find ridiculous
If a bit of tincan provide that much protection why isn’t it used on every tank in existence
Or atleast the Western mbts
2 Likes
So new development on the matter
The post is now hidden for no particular reason as it’s just two link for bug reports on the same matter for two different nations
Armor suggestions for balance logic can’t be for one vehicle, it has to be a formal suggestion for all vehicles of that type. And due to the nature of the suggestion, it has to be a well put together short essay with good argumentation & evidence.
I thought about making one personally, however I put that on hold.
It’s not off topic. It’s the bug report on LWS for Leclerc Vs STRV 122. For Leclerc they wanted detailed documents on how Leclercs Gallix has LWS while on STRV they only wanted pictures of where the LWS is.
Forget it, if he’s not the one writing the message, he’ll consider it off-topic…
As for your message, I think that someone who didn’t like the fact that you were revealing the truth would have posted it. If that person likes to waste time annoying people, there’s not much they can do about it.
As for the video, however accurate and useful it may be, Gaijin will out of laziness declare that it’s not accepted because it’s “exaggerated”, “false”, “misleading” and probably a thousand other false reasons. All we can do is wait for the moderators to accept Wareta’s bug report.
Bigger issue with videos is that no matter what they always consider it could be either a rendering (especially when it’s lower quality) or sped up even when there’s no indicator or similar
As for the Gaijin rendering, you can’t reproach it in the case of this video, it’s an old video so obviously it’s not in 4k.
However, I think the problem is that when the moderators see the video, they’ll refuse it simply because it’s not in English or Russian. And activating subtitles is far too technical.
The pylon at the rear of the turret is the air probe (already present on the other Leklonks).
The second pylon in the middle of the turret is a pylon with cameras so that the crew can monitor the tank’s immediate surroundings.
2 Likes
This thing is the LWS on the AZUR
XLR Brochure, a modification of Leclercs and the latest upgrade, GALIX has been used
xlr brochure.rar (3.0 MB)
So, unless AZUR have an LWS sensor but they putted it just for fun, that should be more than enough to warrant the addition of LWS
ok, thanks for the information I wasn’t sure.
Laser receiver for training laser simulation system (here at the CENZUB => Centre d’ENtrainement en Zone UrBaine)
ok ok Thanks a lot.
On the other hand, on the video it is said that the AZUR “normally” had a very special camouflage designed to evolve in urban environments. Do you know if Gaijin respected this? Perhaps this camouflage is available on the devs serv?
It’s very possible the type of LWS from AZUR has been taken into XLR along many other parts including the design of the skirts