Re: Galix
Would this be sufficent proof?
.jpg)
.jpg)
2 Likes
Issue updated hope it will be enough
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/2QPU8eJZaDIP
4 Likes
Hate how they say if no new information is provided during 48h the thing will be closed
So in case someone does find new info they need to go through the entire process again and link the content of the old thread if that one hasn’t been deleted
Look at my response, i think this is an enough clear source and proof don’t you think that?
2 Likes
I do think yea
question is if it’s enough for that gaijin employee
For a French vehicle
4 Likes
The issue with Gaijin is whatever change you want you need a valid source while they apparently don’t or at least don’t have to provide us with it so they can go with whatever they want to be true. It’s a system I don’t support but sadly there isn’t much we can do about it. Meaning if they find just a very small mention of something or even a wrongly translated document they can use it and never have to show it to us.
There isn’t much to do cause legally they can’t share a lot of sources they pay for.
All copywritten works would be by name only.
All export restricted works they got permission to use would just not be shareable.
And so forth.
They’re legally required to keep most if not nearly all sources to themselves.
They should at least name them. We’ve seen how often they had very wrong data for a lot of their things. I’m worried about them using russian sources prefered over original or nation of origin ones. AFAIK that’s what happened to Mistral which why almost all stats of Mistral are wrong (example 12G instead of 30)
I think the sources provided are enough, beside that its kind od obvious Galix has been used on Leclerc and the AZUR is not a new tank but a kit mounted in a S2
Take a look at this report:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/TwxfhexLk43L
See the difference?
This is… no words for this. Instead of asking for more source they just need to see where it is on the tank for reference…
@Mobius_Einherjar was kindly enough to spot it on the azur specifically and the response was basically that photo can’t be used like why would a lws sensor would be there then?
Thats the LWS on the azur,
I made both report on the leclerc and strv because even strv122 use galix but im disappointed how they are handling the report on the leclercs while i think on the strv122 is being handled correctly in my opinion. Considering one of the first adopter of galix was in fact leclercs and and lacroix itself is french.
It’s weird to see. For whatever reason they handle them so different
Save the Leclercs!
2 Likes
I made a report about nera and era
In that book he talk about what was the composition of the armor blocks?
Does it mention the use of galix on leclerc or the use of lws on the azur?
no it’s just that
Absolutely nothing prevents them from naming their sources so that people can check if said sources are correct or not.
They just don’t want to, because as Spookston once said: “they’ll only enact the bug report that gives them an outcome that they want”, and giving us the name of their sources might lead us to disproving them, which would go against what gaijin wants.
That double standard, jeez. And gaijin wonders why French mains/players are so aggy towards them…
1 Like
Yea ask the cv9040c which got its ammo load decreased from 230 ish to just 120
Yessir