It’s a shame protection map won’t show these to you, obviously this isn’t LFP but witness THIS
5 Likes
hahahahah AHAHAHA I’m witnessing. New favorite shitshow thread detected. Light tanks without scouting indeed.
Especially funny swithcing between threads were people claim the abrams is useless and this.
34 mm ladies and gentlemen can we go lower than 34 do I see a hand (although it’s optics so kinda cheating)
4 Likes
what happened to that shot? oneshot your turret crew? with it being flat the zsu should be able to still pen it from like 500m? man if that thing wouldnt be slow af id just bring it to top tier and spam it at leclercs turret faces in citybrawls. equally bullshit like sniping the commander cupolas of m48s with the gepards or similar aa oneshotting their whole turret crew with 30 mil aphe through the most vulnerable point right on top of the tank. Realistic af.
They mostly only damage the optics - protection analysis being one thing, someone should test these in game
Letsa go :-D
Leclerc has ERA behind the turret armor in bustle area
This is correct only to some extent, ERA is used on SXXI while S1, S2 and AZUR would use NERA.
1 Like
in the game, all of them have ERA
I believe it was reported quite a long time ago
try playing the challenger 2
@WaretaGarasu While we are at it I’d also request if you could take a look at the bugs with the 2A5/2A6 NL’s.
We got copy-paste Leopards, but it seems Gaijin can’t even add those without issues.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/u1QwbmXl1Rfo
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/J61XwJtZUJml
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/3O1B4KR2Qst0
1 Like
Not really related to the Leclerc, but here’s a point of comparison so you can truly appreciate the accuracy of the Leclerc: M1 Abrams’ 120mm Dispersion is Far too Small
At the same distance and whilst moving, the Leclerc will be over 6 times as accurate xD
14 Likes
Any day now…
To be fair, if you’ve only got a couple Leclercs, you’d probably design it to be damn sure you wouldn’t miss.
Less of a priority when you’ve that many Abrams, one of them’s bound to end up hitting something.*
*Before the Americans come for my head, this is mostly a joke.
2 Likes
Therefore, the dispersion of the Abrams’ 120mm cannon at a distance of 2,000m cannot be considered less than 60cm since not all targets were even hit
That’s not really how dispersion works. Dispersion is typical given as standard deviation from the centre of the target, average distance from the centre of the target, or the distance which 50% of the shots landed within.
I don’t know how it is treated in War Thunder. But if 16 of 18 shots landed within 60 cm of the target then the dispersion would be less than 60 cm regardless of which definition you use.