They can add another AZUR based on the XXI and folder it with the first. That could actually be viable
Well if thats whats gonna happen then current AZUR shouldnt be sitting at the end of the line.
No SXXI have used AZUR as far as i remember, the current iteration of AZUR is the 2006 P1, which is based off an S2.T9
are there any other Leclerc’s you think should come now that we are starting to get closer to the xlr
Personally the next better tank is the XLR, but it will play very similar to the SXXI,
They could add EMBT(2017) i guess, and XLR
Off to mind, it comes also the UAE Leclercs, they’re basically better S2, they would be good squadron vehicles or even premium.
If we don’t talk about straight up better vehicles, they could always add the prototypes
Could help fill the GAP,
Also, i’d like to see the Leclerc MSC as well, which is the most “original” prototype we will probably see.
Spoiler
4 Likes
if we can get a lower br leclerc we could hopefully have something to pair french light tanks with
2 Likes
Spoiler
4 Likes
or you know just receive another spaa because clearly gaijin loves doing that
3 Likes
I dunno why people are so upset by this. The French tech tree has lacked SPAA for the longest time. I think the fact that they’re finally adressing this issue is not a bad thing (though it would be nice if the low-mid tier SPAA were a bit more WW2 friendly.)
1 Like
I think the problem is that was a multi year wish and well the amx 10p could have had a Milan, which is even more upsetting because the addition of the tpk it invalidates the amx 10p making it in my opinion a useless addition with how its implemented currently.
Its not a complete negative they just over delivered on a request which isn’t bad but with how long it takes changes to come to vehicles or the tech tree in the past it feels like a wasted ticket
3 Likes
it should be a modification for the leclerc S2
1 Like
pretty sure on the old forum thats what it was suggested as
1 Like
- Leclerc s. 1, Leclerc s. 2, Leclerc s. 2 (AZUR), Leclerc s. 21:
- Roof MG changed to a copy-paste one without name
- Max speed: 71.08 / -37.43 → 71.79 / -37.8 km/h
new data mines
6 Likes
Seems like they are working on my acceleration report, since one of the change was correct the forward speed/reverse speed.
Also FYI its not Roof MG but the Coaxial, seem they’re changing the name of some other stuff, but we will see tomorrow hopefully.
9 Likes
did they ever say anything about the roof mg report in the past
Leclerc MBTs have no pressure chamber to allow to evacuate the fumes
That allows more velocity (thanks to higher calibre) with a shorter package (Leclerc’s main gun caliber is L52 while the Leopard 2A5 is L44)
Spoiler
The counterpart to this advantage is that the Leclerc needs to be NRBC sealed to fire its main gun so it’s impossible to use the roof-mounted MG.
That could be the reason, of course in game we do now have tankers getting out to fire the roof MG’s, but thats a fair reason i guess.
I personally didn’t bothered much to look at it, but if i gather more informations i will eventually report it.
10 Likes
İs there any news for upcoming armor report?
You mentioned couple weeks ago that new report will be here soon.
Not yet.
3 Likes
Okay thanks.
I’m a bit confused as to why there are so minor adjustments for the speed. I guess some ratios got changed, but really, they are so insignificant that I would honestly begin to question: Why? Because this is honestly an irrelevant change. Unless an overall change happened which will be important in the future.
Otherwise, this took time away from other, more interesting features or fixes that could be worked on.
[Edit] So the reason comes from the Leclerc being fixed to a limit of 72 kph. That’s why. I guess you cannot argue with what is a documented fix.