ERA evraywhere was less common when i grinded them.
Still i think my brain just deleted the trauma from my mind. Don’t even want to imagine how it is to grind them now
ERA evraywhere was less common when i grinded them.
Still i think my brain just deleted the trauma from my mind. Don’t even want to imagine how it is to grind them now
I can’t see why it can’t be added
Oh don’t worry, it’s gonna be added to every NATO tank in WT, except Leclercs.
Didn’t they say they had a Leclerc copeblog in the making? The brits got theirs on their challengers so where is the Leclerc one? We’re almost at 2.5k replies and still almost none of the fixes have been implemented…
I think they’ll fix a lot of things regarding Leclercs situation in the next update, especially if they release the XLR and a premium leclrc
I hope so…
let’s hope for the best
page 70
SHARD would be nice. The only difference it would make as of right now over DM53 is that the left side of the Abrams turret cheek (when looking at it from the front) would become penetrable at close range - but US mains still haven’t figured out that DU isn’t modelled in the turret armour. But I doubt France will get the best round even if the 2A7 is the best vehicle in-game (once the devs uncook the model) and has the best round.
Leclerc XLR would just be copy-paste with 4th gen thermals. It would be better off coming once there’s more info about a possible French APS.
What France really needs is light vehicles. In which case there’s two really good options:
EBRC Jaguar (suggestion passed to devs December 2021):
Vextra POLE (suggestion passed to devs December 2023):
Since France hasn’t received an accurately modelled vehicle since the SXXI, hopefully we see the EBRC Jaguar this update. It’s not as if the devs have been sitting on the suggestion for over 2 years.
Anyway, we’re pretty prepared on the bug report side of things for the Jaguar so it would come into the game very accurate.
DM53 is currently underperforming fyi. The density is too low (per Rheinmetall).
Hopefully that gets fixed. That would make part of the Abrams turret penetrable at close range. Maybe the devs would be more open to SHARD.
Lets be honest here… they will only add SHARD with XLR, butcher it and go “well, gib us precise numbers )))”.
I have no doubt
Indeed, the jaguar would be chef kiss. And it’s CTA40 canon could be found in other funny vehicles, such as a VAB 6x6 with an unmanned turret literally slapped in it.
hope they fix AHEAD
Is it stabilised tho?
yeah obviously.
you never know
A bit of context: this photo comes from a presentation in 2000 by the Chairman of CTA International on the 40mm CTA autocannon (found on the Jaguar). CTA International is a joint venture between BAE Systems and GIAT. “Improved Sighting (BGTI)” refers to the 2nd gen thermal imager that was standardised on British vehicles such as the Warrior - so it’s irrelevant to any French vehicle.