I’m not trying to defend the mods and dev’s here but they’ve said before that video evidence alone isn’t good enough. Is there a source like Marc Chassillan’s that backs up the video’s? Perhaps a trial?
Wait, so they used a single source from Chassilan to cancel several sources from him as well?
I’m not familiar with the sources but… That feels even worse.
That source just happen to validate their pov, they will find another excuse if what Marc Chassillan has written don’t go their way.
SOURCES & COVERS ATTACHED :
1.1: An Outstanding MBT, Military Technology 24.9 (2000): 43-8. ProQuest. Web. 22 Jan. 2020
1.2: Biblioteka Magazynu, AMX Leclerc, 2001
1.3: Foreign Military Review, Issue 2, 1995
1.4: International Defense Review, Vol. 20, Iss. 6, 1987
1.5: International Defense Review, Vol. 22, Iss. 10, 1989
1.6: Jane’s Armour and Artillery 2005-06, Tony Cullen and Christopher F. Foss, Jane’s Yearbooks, Jane’s Information Group, p. 24 - ISBN 10 071062686X
1.7: JPRS Report, Central Eurasia. Military affairs, 1995, p. 103
1.8: Military Technology, Issue 9, Vol. XIV, 1990
1.9: TahkoMacptep, Iss. 2-3, 1998
1.10: The World’s most powerful tanks, M. Haskew, p. 206
This are all the sources i used, Marc Chassilian is considered as a second source, just like those source i used.
1 Like
Maybe the devs want war with us haha
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
8 Likes
That’s totally it , We mustn’t give up and piss them off with the Leclercs
1 Like
if I have to piss off the developers every day with well I will
1 Like
We’d need to collectively throw matches pretty much at this point. Which is easier said than done.
They’re likely to use the excuse that the Leclerc still has a high win rate even if they start conceding on reports.
None of the devs even want to discuss the Leclerc’s problems. They just say that their sources are correct and don’t let it go any further. They’re completely uninterested in working with us so we can help them improve their game.
1 Like
I’m about ready to go back into Hibernation at the very least. This entire process has been exhausting and spoils the entire game for me.
Sure, we shouldn’t give up. But we can’t keep throwing ourselves at the wall that is the Gaijin development team and expect a different outcome. Which to be honest, this is just a video game that they want us to spend money on. I have real life to prioritize, instead of putting more and more time into this.
2 Likes
I understand you
I’m laughing too cause I switched to the US because they had an IFV in their lineup now they reload faster than my Leclercs. Astounding that the only French IFV (ignoring the SPAA “IFV”) remains a premium and now on top of that my firepower advantage is gone.
4 Likes
Man do I long for the VCI, VBCI 2 w/ T40, and EBRC Jaguar 😩
…and side note, ERC 90 Sagaie 🤙
4 Likes
we all want developers to buff other nations that are left abandoned
3 Likes
I wouldn’t call the 4000 a meta defining vehicle. With those very limited range magics, you’re really going to go from target to target, hoping that you can launch even one of them. The chaos of 16v16 really benefits cheeky long range missile shots. The 4000 is really only useful by the endgame when actual dogfights happen, and that very rarely happens when both team consists of Su-27s and F-15s that kill each other from 12 km away in the first 90 seconds of the match…
Unfortunately, I have seen that the Leclerc has not improved. I had a quick question, has the subject of the galix system ever been discussed with the devs?
No, nothing has improved on the tank, we don’t expose the problems but no response from the devs, they are blind, and for the system you’re talking about, I couldn’t tell you
And to think that I switched from world of tank to War thunder thinking that gajins were more attuned than wargaming
Abrams: better reload, better armor, better survivability, best round in the game, probably spall liners in next patch. Leclerc: bruh
9 Likes