you still have the 6km track range of the agm 65 B…
Doesn’t really matter, you are not fighting 16 enemies at the same time like in ARB.
In the short engagement distance of GRB doesn’t matter either.
Rafale does the same thing SU30 does to the enemy
Magic to are as good if not better as R73, depending on situation.
Ah yea the old song again…
But got it. Rafale bad, Su30 OP.
1 Like
It is also weird, why SU-30SM is able to load 12 of R-77-1. I researched open sources, found no evidence of installing 12 AAM on this plane, there is only 6 AAM stated officially. So, it is possible, we have not only fake advertisment missiles, also fake loadouts.
max missile amounts for russian aircrafts are often misleading, one has to rely on images of missiles on different pylons to add these missile
su30sm can carry atleast carry10 r77-1. the dual rack r77-1 between the intakes is found on su35, theoretically it can be also done on su30sm easily but we dont have any pictures for
If you want to go down the road of “fake” loadouts.
I also read somewhere the A10 had issues with damaged tires when they used the 3xMaverick pylons and therefore stopped doing that.
And there are probably plenty more cases like that.
To be honest, KH38 is the only thing that makes ussr plane tree worth grinding.
Removing it is not an option.
Your words, not mine. Kh38 should never been added in the first place, simply way too powerful and no AA can fight it except the pantsir, which is in the same nation the Kh38’s are so it wont face each other, ever. Very fair.
11 Likes
Yet the only option for other countries, that would be able to reliably destroy pantsirs with same level of ez as kh38 does - was mutilated into oblivion, made into a complete fake weaponry.
There’s two ways of resolving this topic.
1)They keep being silent - hence creating a precedent for every other country to demand ANY weaponry that at least had 1 mockup.
2)They come forward and prove that 38MT exists and then we can start talking about how wrong it’s targeting works.
I don’t see a third option, really.
3 Likes
I’m just amazed by how selective Gaijin can be in their standards.
Yes, the missile should be removed immediately, it’s unbelievable how it could have been added on such loose grounds in the first place given the incredible impact such a weapon has on the meta.
2 Likes
But why does Gaijin rely on pylons to assign the correct number of missiles for russian aircraft but for the Eurofighter they just use the standard loadout shown on images and leave it like that
for example in eurofighter?
well you just said that they use the pylons on russian aircraft to assign the correct number of missiles, which is good. But there are multiple threads on the Eurofighter using the same pylons all over and some secondary sources stating that these pylons can carry amraams. Yet Gaijin keeps insisting on using only the standard of 6 amraams + fuel tanks. That seems a bit like a double standard
if you would link me the pics of these pylons with amraams (other than the ones in game) for a “tranche 3” eurofighter, it would be more helpfull
1000 replies and still no sources proving its existence
at this point id say were getting close to 98% certainty that its fake
17 Likes
ok so maybe i misunderstood your first comment. Just for clarification: do they add missiles to russian loadouts by getting an image of every single pylon and assign them or do they specify the type of pylon and then assign the missiles to all pylons of that type?
really dont understood what you are asking
are you asking how they add these missile in game using codes?
or how they decide how many missiles to put?
how they decide how many missiles to put on a plane
i believe they use multiple online sources and images of missiles on different pylons pylons as i said before
yeah my question was if you know if they do indeed check every individual pylon for the type of missile or if they just add them for the type of pylon in a “if one can all can” type of way
they do check for every individual pylon, however i dont think so they have done that when it comes to kh38 on su30sm.
Ok but with a turret it cannot physically handle, I think that is FAR more of a problem from a fictional standpoint than the KH-38MT