the devs tell us that they have a source that we arent allowed to know about and nothing changes /s
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
I have asked for my links to be reviewed, and several cannot be used because they mention a current conflict… others a tiny bit sketchy but not the worst, and the last were confidential… so yup, Smin is going to check em out.
But in any case they all mention KH-38M coming into production in 2012, and the MT, or MTE, being used.
Lastly, you did start this topic, what did you expect? People will have extreme discourse about it, because it’s a good CAS weapon, pair it with Russia’s first thermal pod on a good fighter, and bam, it’s OP even though for years others had thermals and the ability to nuke people from space.
links/images of current conflict arent explicitly banned, iirc they just cant show people in any way
you saying a source mentioning current conflicts cant be used just seems completely fake
why dont you ask the mod that you sent that to, to confirm that such sources exist; without doing that the consensus is that you are lying about having sources
1 Like
Bruh, the abrams reload like all the other manual loader times are fake… they’re typically 1 sec slower irl.
Not to mention, you do understand if they fix the mess the abrams is, it will become less powerful? Because it won’t black hole shells anymore chief.
Agreed 110% they killed helicopter gameplay, the tanks are meh at best…
They’re reporting everything now lol
Ask @Surbaissemaxxing bro, I literally sent them to him, he included Smin.
Stop being so accusatory, it’s bad for your health.
Not to mention, you do understand if they fix the mess the abrams is, it will become less powerful? Because it won’t black hole shells anymore chief.
This is… an amazing take. Completely unhinged, but amazing.
7 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
The only thing you could argue is fake about them is their unchanging and constant reload rate regardless of terrain, but in terms of actual speed, most of them are actually underperforming as loader specifications tend to call for reloads shorter than 5s under ideal conditions (iirc for the Abroomz it’s even as low as 3s, and for the Leo 2 its around 4s).
On the other hand, we also don’t have to deal with the fact a real-life T-series crew won’t just stack APFSDS shells within the carousel, and instead it will be KE - HE - HEAT - KE - repeat; meaning if you wanna fire KE two times in a row, you’ll have to jump over two other projectiles, lenghtening the reload out to about 9 seconds…
So, objectively speaking, neither side has “realistic reloads” as both are “fake” in one way or another, and crying crocodile tears about one side not having to deal with their real life downsides (whilst ignoring that the other also doesn’t) is simply disingenuous.
edit: seriously?
12 Likes
No.
There are significant model deficinencies causing incorrect weaknesses. Not to mention to the butcherd turret transverse etc.
LMAO, how can you say that about abrams when you play russia
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
The sources were given, and most of them do talk about the conflict (hence why they could not be shared), however tbf they didn’t reveal much info, just some mentions of it without additional images
16 Likes
Not to mention their mobility.
They drive around like they’re in mario-kart in this game, yet in real life they judder all over the place.
Meanwhile you have the challenger 2 which dumps all its speed in a turn, in direct opposite to real life. There’s a wonderful video showing a ch2 doing a long turn in real life vs in game and its eye opening how bad the transmission modelling is in the game.
However, I feel like we’re very off-topic again. Not that there’s likely to be any more valid information as the weapon clearly doesn’t exist.
ok so they didnt actually prove anything
just him hyping them up
2 Likes
Did they explicitly mention it’s usage or just say it exists or just mention them by name?
No mentions of it’s usage, so yea. Some article(s) just mention it randomly when talking about all variants, but that is not about usage
2 Likes
so theres a good chance they just copied stuff from the brochures? with it being listed among the other variants that literally doesnt mean anything
3 Likes
if they had any semblence of credibility, they would copy from the brochure instead of making stuff up, hence no new info lol
yep, and he was really hyping those up too
its almost like he never wanted to post them or share them with mods
3 Likes