Technically, governments can put classified information on publicly available websites. However.
It will always very explicitly say it is, you can send an image of that warning if it exists in literally any scenario unless it explicitly says it’s also included in the restrictions
95% of the time it will be behind a login anyways.
There are very rare instances where neither of the other two are true, however this is comically shoddy work, for the absolute loosest of export restrictions.
MT or ML? Cuz ML is known to be in combat, I havent seen anything about MT being used in combat, and im pretty sure i remember exactly what you’re saying being mentionned about ML.
I’d post articles but war related sources can’t be posted on the forums, None I’ve seen say anything but the Kh-38ML has seen action, including .ru sources
If you switch the language to EN in the same link, it does mention all four variants …
ROE recently re-designed their website so I wouldn’t read too much into stuff being missing (And this page is for MLE variant anyways).
A few weeks ago as I was making reports, the link in my reports would break because they were constantly changing page addresses and their website was buggy etc.
I mean, the russian language version is more likely to be most up to date
and we know that at one point they were mentioned so unless it was removed and then re-added to the english version without being added back for russian its a pretty good indication that the program is dead
yeah its not a priority to remove the mentions from the english version because the people likely to call them out on it would view the russian page where they are removed
you mean the people who would have made the decision to cut funding would look at the russian page right? while export customers who might fund development would look at the english one.