Oh yes, absolutely, but “Functional” and not just a model?
All we can see in that image is some sort of seeker, but we have no way of verifying what kind of seeker that is or if it is actually functional.
7 Likes
look pretty real, you can see the gymbal and the cables, is not a piece of plastic like other years
At this point I’ll take any CAS nerf, ergo this things removal (people are still gonna be mad at something ie Kh-29) and Hammer seeker nerf
It is needed to remove those modern Kh family air-to-ground missiles that Russia has
smth like Kh38 like a 10-year advance than the air-to-ground missile that other countries had
like brimstone/mavrick
Gaijin constantly trying to bias the RUS side as much as they want
Also if they showed it in the Army 2024, but it wouldn’t be funcional?, they showed things that are primarily for export, if they show the Kh38mt there, sure is funcional
I didn’t say fake, it might be very real. But it might also just be a new or updated TV seeker for all we know. Or not functional at all.
To my knowledge they haven’t. The only images that anyone in this thread have been able to find is computer generated 3D images or photos of a showroom mockup with some sort of unknown seeker in it.
MANY companies show things for export that are not ready or even have a working prototype yet. It’s a very common practise.
10 Likes
Museum Ordnance Special Number 23 - Scorpion, Scimitar, and Sabre, by John Prigent, ASIN: B001KL65L6
New Vanguard Scorpion, by Sarson, ISBN-10: 1855323907
Tanks Illustrated No 22 Scorpion, by Simon Dunstan, ISBN-10: 0853687471
Not saying those sources are correct, just saying the report had sources not feelings. Either way this is about the Kh-38MT.
You even agreed with me that there’s been no evidence of mass production posted in the topic.
Also changing the way Kh-38MT locks targets to what it should be would nerf it for ground battles to potentially below AGM-65D/G levels of effectiveness.
Also @ShOt_MaCkEr it’s best not to indirectly go against the Ho-229 being in game by attacking aircraft introduced via the same exact rules: Yak-141. If you want to discuss the unfinished prototype ruleset clearly seen from the outside, we can talk in DMs or on those topics.
Fair enough
Yes but is very different when a company show you this, and says is for export!
AND WHEN a company show you this, and also says is for export:
I did read the thread, you know what’s even better? It took 2 secs to find a KH-38MT image 😂 sheesh.
@MythicPi what country are you from? Where I live I found info nearly instantly.
Also, @Rennie1018129
Obj. 279: 3
Obj. 906: 20
Obj. 775: 2
Obj. 140: estimates are between 8-12
Obj. 260: 7
So yup typically higher numbers than 1-2 some of the far more costly tanks have lower numbers though.
If you have said info why not share it instead of complaining about the threads existence
7 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Because it’s probably not declassified???
Funny how that works, if its classified why state you could find it, once again please stop making everything a sob story about how everyone hates russia especially when its a genuine effort to find information which this is
9 Likes
You’re not the brightest are you? Classified information can be found online, but not distributed. Hence the recent F-14 leak thanks to certain people…. Sheesh
Sob story? No.
Reality? Yes. Every day many posts come up claiming Russian bias, Russia op, etc.
Guess what? People think the Brit’s are bad, and I love them over Russian tanks. The fox still has yet to be nerfed either! lol talk about bias.
1 Like
Maybe im not, but end of the day whos the one here trying to say “its hate specifically directed at russia” i dont think its me
2 Likes
So I need to go link every post to prove this? Morvran is pretty anti Russian and he’s in here.
Also you mentioned the fox, it was literally nerfed this update
1 Like
Well, we learned that the IR Hammers and Kh-38MT seekers aren’t supposed to have direct lock onto targets but are supposed to lock onto a target programmed; a lock functionality that could very well [potentially] make it worse than AGM-65s.
I wouldn’t call a fix a nerf. It was grossly over preforming. Same with the F-15E on launch, then they fixed it.
A nerf is artificial.
A fix is real.
So if it was found these missiles in their current capacity in game did not do what they can currently do would that not be a fix as well