Not just in the brochure
But after all it’s a completely fictional plane that shouldn’t have been added or removed when the Thai air tree came
1 Like
the m41a1 had its turret traverse nerfed from a source that said m41 had slow turret traverse but this was addressed in the a1 model
2 Likes
It could just be classified… and they don’t want info leaking…
But if we want to go down the “rabbit hole of fake things”
There’s alot of fake USA tanks either with 1 prototype existing or none at all.
Japan has totally made up vehicles, France, etc.
This post sounds like another “I died to Russian CAS, therefore Russian Bias!” Which is a common post for anything Russian, why? Because people think Gaijin is truly in favor or Russia being OP.
Having played the USA tree, Russian, German, Italian, French, and so on, USA, GER, and Sweden are by far the best nations.
They all were dropping mass quantities of bombs and the like for awhile.
This KH-38Mt wasn’t a problem on the Su-25SM3 because it was easily killed. But now when people need only a little bit of skill to kill an aircraft they break down on the forums how things are imaginary because they can’t find data for it… I don’t live in China, so I doubt I’d be able to find up to date data on new weapons or vehicles… like cmon.
2 Likes
Mi-28A for Sweden will go bye bye too, as they were only tested, not bought.
Same logic can apply to literally the entire object series of tanks if you wanna go that far, if you took the time to actually read the thread rather than “its anti russian” as you always do you would see all evidence in either case is being considered
10 Likes
When Russians argue like Abrams apologists
3 Likes
Dude Why are you wasting time with these fools? You showed that the KH38MT exists more than just a model with a functional IR Seeker. The other guy showed that it was displayed in 2024. That’s enough. If they want to continue believing Mythic’s lies, that’s fine.
They keep saying that the Kh38MT was cancelled because it was removed from the Rosoboronexport website, or some nonsense like that. Gaijin is not going to remove the Kh38MT. That hurts them, you have to understand that, that’s why they keep going with all this nonsense.
3 Likes
Feels longer :P
1 Like
I don’t think this has been shown, where did you see this?
10 Likes
You’re argument was that in some cases only 1 was made, kindly show me where several prototypes of the object series that actually share designation have been produced, or maybe do us all a favour and actually read the thread rather than “this is something against russia” because it seems that’s literally all you do
1 Like
In this photo, you can clearly see the seeker, it is not a model like the ones before. Like this one for example with the seeker being just a piece of plastic:
Oh yes, absolutely, but “Functional” and not just a model?
All we can see in that image is some sort of seeker, but we have no way of verifying what kind of seeker that is or if it is actually functional.
8 Likes
look pretty real, you can see the gymbal and the cables, is not a piece of plastic like other years
At this point I’ll take any CAS nerf, ergo this things removal (people are still gonna be mad at something ie Kh-29) and Hammer seeker nerf
It is needed to remove those modern Kh family air-to-ground missiles that Russia has
smth like Kh38 like a 10-year advance than the air-to-ground missile that other countries had
like brimstone/mavrick
Gaijin constantly trying to bias the RUS side as much as they want
Also if they showed it in the Army 2024, but it wouldn’t be funcional?, they showed things that are primarily for export, if they show the Kh38mt there, sure is funcional
I didn’t say fake, it might be very real. But it might also just be a new or updated TV seeker for all we know. Or not functional at all.
To my knowledge they haven’t. The only images that anyone in this thread have been able to find is computer generated 3D images or photos of a showroom mockup with some sort of unknown seeker in it.
MANY companies show things for export that are not ready or even have a working prototype yet. It’s a very common practise.
11 Likes
Museum Ordnance Special Number 23 - Scorpion, Scimitar, and Sabre, by John Prigent, ASIN: B001KL65L6
New Vanguard Scorpion, by Sarson, ISBN-10: 1855323907
Tanks Illustrated No 22 Scorpion, by Simon Dunstan, ISBN-10: 0853687471
Not saying those sources are correct, just saying the report had sources not feelings. Either way this is about the Kh-38MT.
You even agreed with me that there’s been no evidence of mass production posted in the topic.
Also changing the way Kh-38MT locks targets to what it should be would nerf it for ground battles to potentially below AGM-65D/G levels of effectiveness.
Also @ShOt_MaCkEr it’s best not to indirectly go against the Ho-229 being in game by attacking aircraft introduced via the same exact rules: Yak-141. If you want to discuss the unfinished prototype ruleset clearly seen from the outside, we can talk in DMs or on those topics.
Fair enough
Yes but is very different when a company show you this, and says is for export!
AND WHEN a company show you this, and also says is for export:
I did read the thread, you know what’s even better? It took 2 secs to find a KH-38MT image 😂 sheesh.
@MythicPi what country are you from? Where I live I found info nearly instantly.
Also, @Rennie1018129
Obj. 279: 3
Obj. 906: 20
Obj. 775: 2
Obj. 140: estimates are between 8-12
Obj. 260: 7
So yup typically higher numbers than 1-2 some of the far more costly tanks have lower numbers though.