The Kh-38MT may not actually exist

if one particular weapon on three planes is getting a disproportionate amount of kills and the player base is asking for A. its removal due to lack of evidence of its actual existence B.I know I have and a decent few others have suggest replacements that fit the better inline with what everyone else has

then that is people asking better balance you also pretend like people haven’t been asking for better spaa which is just wrong

1 Like

You know what, you’re right.

Let’s remove the F-16AJ right now and add the XF-2A in its place, at the same BR.

2 Likes

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

1 Like

They made it very clear in their F-16AJ announcement that it was an exception to the rules. No such lines are present in the various aircraft that have Kh 38MTs.

1 Like

Those exceptions are the problem here.
People’s suggestions getting denied for lack of evidence, all the while complete fiction gets through must be really upsetting.

Did they even define a set of rules to differentiate all the fictional rejects from the possible “exceptions” ?

Speaking of deleting things, I’m still surprised how no one called out Gaijin for their different standard when it comes to deleting vehicles and weapons, as the former actually is never truly deleted.

So did Mi-35M but bringing that up would mean having to show that Russia had their own way of bringing down the hammer just like the US )))

But it was ALSO Russia who received a proper counter-vehicle out of all the others first;

  • 1.87 - Tunguska is added
  • 1.89 - ADATS is added
  • 1.89 - FlaRakPz 1 is added

So for a whole patch they had the ability to stop the AH-1Z from being an issue, but nobody else could do the same to their Mi-35M

Lmao. Little buddy thought he had a “gotcha” moment hahaha.

15 Likes

I haven’t even been playing back then, didn’t they have M247 yet ?

So I thought I’d check today and see what I can find.
No hard proof, just continued insistence into the present day that Kh-38MT is real.

Links for those interested parties.

КТРВ на форуме «Армия-2024» - bmpd — LiveJournal
Корпорация «Тактическое ракетное вооружение» на МАКС-2021 - bmpd — LiveJournal
https://archive.ph/sIyav#:~:text=semi-active%20laser%3B-,X-38MTE,-–%20inertial%20%2B%20thermal%20imaging
https://archive.ph/pRbbP#selection-445.244-445.251:~:text=Х-38МЛЭ%20и-,Х-38МТЭ,-%2C%20Х-69%2C%20Х

At the very least there’s a decent amount of insistence on the matter, just no solid evidence of any Kh-38MT having been assembled and publicly shown.

4 Likes

Autocannon shells were despawning past ~3km’s so M247 was irrelevant to helis with longer ranged ATGMs back then. The only way to counter helis was with SAM SPAA’s or spawning jets (that had no flares, against AIM-9L/Ms and R-60Ms lol).

3 Likes

If you’re think otherwise then you’re delusional.

Gaijin have standards?

They still have Kh-38MTE available for export.
https://roe.ru/en/production/aviatsionnaya-tekhnika-i-vooruzhenie-vozdushno-kosmicheskikh-sil/aviatsionnye-sredstva-porazheniya/upravlyaemye-sredstva-porazheniya/aviatsionnye-upravlyaemye-rakety-obshchego-naznacheniya-klassa-vozdukh-poverkhnost/kh-38mle/?theme=theme-lightblue
So if you have enough money you can buy it.

2 Likes

They have until they don’t.

2 Likes

ok i finally got out of the gulag after 2 weeks anything new?

1 Like

Nah. Nothing.

bruh

Start a go-fund me and lets see if its real.

4 Likes

I thought so too :D

1st and 3rd links are quoting same Bloomberg article information in which comes from unnamed source marked as “European and US officials”.
2nd link goes to the article about economy in general not military industrial comples specificaly but civilian parts of it.

Deliver in 2030