if one particular weapon on three planes is getting a disproportionate amount of kills and the player base is asking for A. its removal due to lack of evidence of its actual existence B.I know I have and a decent few others have suggest replacements that fit the better inline with what everyone else has
then that is people asking better balance you also pretend like people haven’t been asking for better spaa which is just wrong
They made it very clear in their F-16AJ announcement that it was an exception to the rules. No such lines are present in the various aircraft that have Kh 38MTs.
Those exceptions are the problem here.
People’s suggestions getting denied for lack of evidence, all the while complete fiction gets through must be really upsetting.
Did they even define a set of rules to differentiate all the fictional rejects from the possible “exceptions” ?
Speaking of deleting things, I’m still surprised how no one called out Gaijin for their different standard when it comes to deleting vehicles and weapons, as the former actually is never truly deleted.
Autocannon shells were despawning past ~3km’s so M247 was irrelevant to helis with longer ranged ATGMs back then. The only way to counter helis was with SAM SPAA’s or spawning jets (that had no flares, against AIM-9L/Ms and R-60Ms lol).
1st and 3rd links are quoting same Bloomberg article information in which comes from unnamed source marked as “European and US officials”.
2nd link goes to the article about economy in general not military industrial comples specificaly but civilian parts of it.