Ive already covered this but the EN page for ROE hasnt really been updated since 2017. The russian one has, and removed mention of the non-SAL variants, suggesting the english webpage has some outdated info while the russian one is the up to date one, and the non-SAL variants have been dropped, or converted into their own munitions (in the case of the Groms). Its point 8 in the original post.
6 Likes
Do it, I haven’t seen any devs or the CM respond to anything in this thread.
I agree with the second part of your second statement. They seem to move the goalpost for USSR but claim they can’t do certain munitions because ‘they’re too advance’.
My favourite part about this whole ordeal. They punished all IR AGMs when only USSR was the issue. There’s so many other ways they could’ve addressed this.
1 Like
There are currently two exceptions: one for a plane they added because they were too lazy to add the F-2.
The other being the Yak-141, a plane which I think they just thought was too cool to pass up. That’s fine by me and by their current addition rules it probably counts anyway.
The Kh38MT is not like the F-16AJ at all. One is a copypaste of an existing plane, the other is a missile that never existed and is significantly better than its counterparts in other nations.
1 Like
F-16AJ is exactly like the Kh-38MT, both are fake AF brochure only and both should be removed permanently.
The key thing I think would be to actually implement Anti-Radiation Missiles, as they would take up stations, while not being useable against non-radiating targets (e.g. tanks), in exchange for reduced SP cost, as well as semi-automated handoff of targets to missiles simplifying acquisition.
this would permit higher performing SAM systems to be justified, or the introduction of shorter-range strategic class SAMs, or static Early Warning radars as AI infrastructure.
The other would be to implement more vehicles with cannons that have access to HE-VT, and better radars (e.g. Sgt.Stout) so incoming ordnance can be more reliably intercepted.
2 Likes
Can somebody confirm or deny if that container is UKR-OE? If yes we have thermal for Su-34 (M433 Raduga-VM) so practically another option to replace Kh-38MT.
It looks like it have rectangular window in bottom of that module (so no front view but better than nothing).
fake but also real
F-16 is a real plane while KH-38MT is not
but the F-16AJ is just Gaijin being lazy and they decide to do a copy paste instead of adding the F-2
1 Like
You forgot about Ho-Ri Production which is still in the game.
F-16A is real, but Japan never really flew it.
That’s like giving vehicles from different TTs to each and every nation to fill in the gaps and as long as the vehicles are real, it should be fine, right ?
38MT is pretty much the same missile as 38ML but with a different seeker type which RU already uses. It’s pretty much the same level of fiction as the F-16A under Japanese flag.
2 Likes
Also German MiG-29G with R-27ER,ET, T is pretty much fake.
They were invited to a demonstration, and got to tag along in a chase plane. And, anyway trialed / demonstrated equipment is sufficient for addition, don’t forget the Swedish; AHS & Mi-28.
So to some degree the F-16AJ meets certain relaxed criteria. Though I do think it could probably stand to be replaced with the F/A-18J or -18L
2 Likes
It still annoys me that we didn’t get the gear door sparrows on the AJ.
A bespoke mechanic, for a copy-pasted airframe that can’t get reused?
Never going to happen.
The same way the US rarely actually receives airframes that can’t (won’t) be duplicated into at least two other trees.
4 Likes
How many hours did F-16AJ had in service for Japan ?
How is that at all relevant?
If they were to rename it F-16 FSD #2, F-16A-10 (Expeditionary), or F-16A-15OCU ( Peace Naresuan I ), and replace the roundels would that sort the issue?
2 Likes
I dont think F&F Brimstones (or F&F ground attack munitions in general) are healthy for the game, and personally believe they should be relegated to air modes only, but gaijin strictly adhering to reality with NATO at the expense of game balance, while just taking an “anything goes” attitude with the Kh-38MT and seemingly Russia in general is annoying
I agree, the game should have stayed with laser guided bombs being the most advanced A2G munition for balance’s sake
4 Likes
too late now
Is it 0 ?
Just as much as Rafale has in RU air force, or many other examples.
Same patch, and bullet despawn range was caliber based, so it had more range than the 35/30/23 mm based SPAA on top of having proxy shells.
The Shturms and Atakas on the Mi-35M had less range and it had a far harder time at defending itself against planes. Everyone that could went for the much stronger AH-1Z. That’s why I grinded it out at the time too.
And the AH-1Z was added with 1.81, a year before the first counters appeared. Talking about introduction dates, the FJ-4B VMF 232 was added in 1.79.
Getting a disproportionate amount of kills is also a function of the plane using them getting a disproportionate amount of spawns. The Rafale isn’t really doing worse despite going up against stronger SPAA.
3 Likes
This reminds me that we should revive the Centauro thread for Russia. xD