Maybe even years
1 Like
@MythicPi is going to change the orignal post whenever something new happened/ has been found out,
there is literally no reason to ask every day
1 Like
I clearly can see a precedent.
It’s a bend of their own rules just to bend their own rules.
Reads as a logical problem:
Does ru need anything better? ----> No
Do they already have something functional and kinda same? —> Yes
Does any other nation has the same/equivalent thing? -----> No
Will it negatively affect CAS/Ground balance? -----> Yes
…
If all above answers were reversed - It would be FINE to add something with the same level of fakeness as KH-38MT. Otherwise it’s not.
8 Likes
At this point I am more interested if anyone is still looking for evidence. I spent a few hours a day for the first week before I came to my own conclusion. Now I am only checking in here to see if any new developments come out of it.
If single evidence of Kh-38MTs being real existed, it wouldve been posted already.
I did some research using RU search engines and Cyrillic to get 100% Russian sources, and all I found were media sites and blogs that all point towards the gun expos and the .ru government site that lists the weapon specs (same as the OP) but that’s about it.
2 Likes
Literally only because it’s Russian. They aren’t duped either, they WILLINGLY choose to take such things as fact and implement them that way for Russia’s benefit in-game. It’s disgraceful behavior from them.
1 Like
I was implying due to total load. 18 > 6 no?
Incorrect. The hull was laid down, and they had some other components made. It was more like 50 ish percent done.
Its armament was set in stone etc etc. just needed more time, but then it was cancelled due to bombing the facility if I recall, so the scrapped it for T-34s and such.
Queue times without the minor nation fleets would be terrible tho
I mean how many ppl even play them. Also the queue times are pretty horrible as is
make a bug report to add a weapon which isnt in game but has more evidence than MT and specifically mention precedent of fictional weapons like MT
1 Like
“Not a bug”
that will be the answer you’ll get
I don’t think you’re understanding what I’m saying.
1:1 the KH-38 is better. No doubt. But no plane is limited to only 6 brimstones.
Therefore, a skilled player, with 18 brimstones can be far more effective, than a bad or even average player with 6 KHs.
Given the fact I have been able to play CAP and smite all the Su-30s in my match in an F-15E, I don’t think the problem is that bad
1 Like
Well Phantom can carry 285x FFARs therefore skilled player can theoretically rack up almost 285x kills with single sortie.
5 Likes
Now that’s just being dastardly.
You know as well as I do, if either a brimstone or KH hits something, it’s dead
I have literally never died to a brim and I’ve been hit by multiple.
you cant be more wrong.
5 Likes
I think I can count on one hand the amount of times I have died to a brimstone, dont try and compare the two of them
2 Likes
What if a skilled player uses antitank smart cluster bombs to get possibly hundreds of kills
1 Like
the thing is in the time it takes for the KH-38 player to launch all 6 missiles and land, the brimstone player might have gotten 2 MAYBE 3 kills if they are lucky due to how slow the missiles are and how fast the platforms are, unless you are stalling you cant get off more then one kill a run and more often then not most tanks take 2 AGMs to kill if its an SPAA it can be 3 due to janky damage models
not quite
isnt it always firing 2 FFARs at the same time