if its a fictional addition to the game yes, even more so if its gamebreaking and not added for balance reasons
At what point did a list of information become evidence of non-existence?
So wait. You’re here not to prove/disprove the existence of the missile.
You came here just to attack the OP for simplifying the conclusion?
So to start a fight or something?
not quite
There’s no proof of the missile existing, it should therefore be removed from the game
5 Likes
It’s almost as if the information provided by the OP is casting doubt into the existence of the missile.
It’s never too late to say you didn’t mean it, right?
hmm, I wonder if you are even reading any of the messages here
1 Like
This topic is initially misleading precisely because of the list of “proofs of non-existence”. Which is a list of incorrectly stated facts. As a result, it seems that the author is neutral, he allegedly provided 1 (one) proof of existence and a whole list of proofs of non-existence. There are more proofs of non-existence, so the missile should be removed. This is a manipulation of facts.
I wonder if MythicPi are even reading any of the messages here
Existence aside, there’s no evidence that any of the planes that carry the MT in the game are actually able to use it IRL …
Yeah he does, just wait a bit lol
imagine someone not being chronicaly in the forum
2 Likes
LOL
What’re u trying to prove to me?
trying to prove apples with peanuts
Seems like it
I meant the same thing in both messages.
Mythic wrote it as “proof of non existence”, which i don’t totally agree with, as it should be “lack of proof for its existence”, but that’s a detail really
However none of this matters, because as Necronomica said earlier, non-existence can’t be proven. This means the missile should be removed from the game until its existence can be proven. In soon-to-be 4000 messages, nobody was able to prove that the missile indeed exists…
Is that clearer ?
3 Likes
That statement is absolutely not true. You can prove non-existence in these fields but its standardly much harder so it’s impractical. I can prove for example that TV-8 tank never existed or other concepts which never went to prototype but it must be well documented.
1 Like
The fact that the topic starter in the first post is engaged in proving non-existence.
Ok? And?