Well, you should also know that the game doesnt treat ships and tanks in the same ways, the “all aspect” range of the seekers is only agaisnt ships not tanks, you cant get a track at a tanks at 20km
Those “speedboats” were Elco class torpedo boats. They’re 25 meters long. Try locking on a tank and see at what range you can get it to switch from POINT to TRACK. It’ll be ~13 km. It’s been that way forever.
But it is not proof of non-existence. That is, the author of the topic is misleading.
But it is not proof of non-existence. That is, the author of the topic is misleading.
That is, the author of the topic is misleading.
The author of the topic collected a bunch of speculations and incorrect interpretations, which for some reason suddenly became “evidence of non-existence”.
1 Like
I am not discussing evidence of existence. I am talking about evidence of “non-existence” that the author allegedly provided. And which is in fact disinformation.
1 Like
Scrolling back i saw u were already in this thread, typical of you to go back to that, you need to prove its existence first.
You always resulting to your not proof of non existence is wrong cause it doesnt apply.
Seriously grasping at straws to justify a gamebreaking weapon
5 Likes
buddy stop move goalposts, you need to prove its existence in the first place, we dont need to do anything
2 Likes
I mean with IOG you launch at 20km and with in 5 seconds the missile is at that 13km mark and is already tracking by IR the ammount of russian mains that keep trying to tell me but bro you can just move, when from 20km you have 5 whole seconds before its tracking
For the 100th time already, non existence can’t be proven.
I could say Chile developped a rainbow colored missile that goes underground and you couldn’t prove it does not exist. That’s why something is considered “non existent” until its existence is proven.
All the author provided was simply mentions of the KH38 available in open source, non of which prove the missile exists.
As such, and as long as the missile’s exitence can’t be proven, it should be removed from the game
Is it though ? That thing has been ruining top tier for a year
2 Likes
If you can’t prove non-existence, then why does the author mislead by providing a long list of supposed proofs? Which are actually incorrectly interpreted facts.
because a lack of evidence of existence is the same as evidence of non existence in this context
2 Likes
The seeker specifications are a complete mystery, there is not a single piece of evidence suggesting its use in combat, nor a single test ever conducted that was made publically available. All we have is pictures of mock-ups and mentions of it in a government site, that’s it.
Everything else was left at the dev’s discretion, and they decided to concoct one of the most broken missiles based on literally nothing, unless Gaijin has access to MoD data the average person doesn’t have permission to request. (in which case they would be in a lot of legal trouble).
We have visual proof of use of the ML being guided by drones, they are launched from SU-34 using GNSS and then guided by different UAV aircraft to hit static targets but that’s about it as far the Kh-38 usage goes.
4 Likes
You’re not serious right? Evidence of non-existence is a completely surreal idea. We need evidence of existence, not the opposite. And we have none. By your logic - eurofighter would be flying with 14x amraams etc. etc. That’s not how it works. It’s you who’s trying to put everyone off track.
The author of this topic to this damn moment made exactly 0 false claims. We wouldn’t be hanging here if we got at least one somewhat real evidence of it’s existence. But there’s NONE. NONE. ZERO.
2 Likes
I wouldnt bother he doesnt listen
2 Likes
The goals were initially changed by the author when he began to provide “proofs of non-existence” in first post.
Of course. So the author of the topic is initially misleading by providing such evidence.
These are not mentions. These are not true.
1 Like
thats the point. every mention that he or anyone else has found does not show the Kh-38MT as a functioning weapon and at most shows a mockup for an expo
1 Like
Tell it to MythicPi
Tic tac stomping everything
4 Likes
you could say he phrased it not perfectly if you really want to play on words
At the end of the day though, it doesn’t change the fact this thing should be removed from the game
3 Likes
its a list of the gathered information that can be found, all leading only to statements that its an idea etc.
You are still moving goal posts here and not doing anything for the topic.
Do you have prove of the missle existing functionaly?
If yes provide it, besides that anything you realy state is useless. We dont need to prove its non existence.
What the OP provided was prove that leads to the topic of the missle potentialy not being real.
All of you russian fanboys were not able to prove the opposite and are only fighting the matter with topics that irrelevant and are grasping for straws
1 Like
This is not evidence of non-existing.
I’m glad you admit that no evidence matters. You just want to remove some weapons from the game.