No, it just means it can neither be disproved or proved until something/someone can prove one way or the other.
There’s a missile US made a couple decades ago. It’s basically a derivative from Maverick family. So at the time it was a very powerful missile. It has gen3 thermals, 150km range. Is compact enough to be used with a quad rail on basically every american/european fighter jet. And because of thrust vectoring system - can actually be fired almost backwards. I have no clue why gaijin refused to add it alongside kh-38mt, they’re basically in the same class of missiles.
3 Likes
Prove to me dragons dont exist. Show me a specific evidence that points to the fact that dragons never existed in real life.
Ill shorten it for you, you cant, because you cant prove non existence, only thing that you can prove is existence of something, and if that proof of existence is lackluster that points to the presumed non-existence of it. After all if XYZ exists and someone claims it does, then there has to be some form of evidence to it.
Now change the dragons to literally anything, same thought process applies. Idk if youre being forcibly argumentative for no other reason than to well, argue with people, or you genuinely dont get the concept of burden of proof at this point.
Ill simplify it. Gaijin added a thing. That things existence has been disputed due to lackluster publically available evidence of existence. It is now on the party making the claim the thing exists (gaijin) to prove that the thing (Kh38MT not ML) exists with public information (since they dont accept classified information) to prove that the thing they claim exists does in fact exist.
25 Likes
All these comments like “prove it doesnt exist then” or “but look at XYZ” or “but nato had ZYX in 20XX for years and it was a problem” all just take away from the issue at hand, try to shift away from the point of conversation or fall into “this stuff was OP before, why cant this be OP now”
The bottom line is, if it doesnt exist, it shouldnt be in the game. Mock up, weird testing planes, munitions that were only designed on paper, wooden half finished mock ups, it doesnt matter, russian, soviet, german, chinese, american or other type, it shouldnt be in the goddamn game.
Ho-Ro “production”, F16AJ, this fuckin thing if gaijin say that the source for it came to them in a dream, etc., it doesnt matter what it is, if they wont accept one type of a thing then they should atleast stick to that decision with all things.
9 Likes
I find this the most likely scenario lmao. Now all we need is a big enough YouTuber to talk about it
10 Likes
Look, I fairly easily disproved his claim by simply telling him about wildlife being discovered every day.
By your logic, something discovered in 2020 didn’t exist at all in 2019. I think you’re mixing up the terms of existence and discovery.
Back to your dragon theory, if the existence of a two-headed dragon was confirmed, I might very well believe three-headed one could be real.
MT is basically a copy of 38ML but with different seeker and given how they made IR seekers for different KH series, I’d say the circumstantial evidence is on their side.
Oh I almost forgot, you can prove something like that didn’t exist by showing us a document stating the project has been cancelled for x reason, so ball is in your court as well.
In law terms, you’re not guilty until proven otherwise and that burden of proof lies with the plaintiff, which is OP in this case.
1 Like
discovery ?
Why are we comparing hidden species in the middle of a jungle or on the ocean’s floor to a missile again ? Are we going to pretend both are the same thing ?
1 Like
It was just a food for thought for certain individuals that claim something can’t exist if it’s not discovered.
It was the easiest to do so with animal species.
however gaijin’s requirements say that proof is needed. you can look at what smin has written earlier.
2 Likes
We had and still have fake stuff in the game that are purposely being added by Gaijin for their reasons.
yes many as non tech tree or added on tech tree due to being required for other essential reasons however, there is no need for an op missile that does not exist.
regardless, the missile should be removed as having any western counterparts added with no proof would be impossible.
gaijin has already been removing fake vehicles and will probably move further with it
3 Likes
Like you are basically right. Mainly for balance reasons. But question is if Kh-38MT is needed for balance? I dont think so.
“balance” (its op and not balanced at all)
2 Likes
The KH38 MT is a man made object, not a black hole which took 50+ years to prove the existence of between it’s theoritical appearence and the proof of its physical existence, same goes for hidden species, which are by definition hidden before they are discovered…
That’s where the comparison falls appart.
- Alien ships in the US tree because of area 51 when ?
- I heard france developped a Mach 5 AGM 20 years ago, it can be carried by rafale, just trust me
See where that goes ? Everyone claiming everything all day long.
6 Likes
this
We don’t really know what Gaijin deems necessary and essential. It might be there to balance out other woes of vehicles that carry such missiles.
Yes, they are removing fake vehicles only when they get to adding real ones in their place.
yes and op weapons are not neccessary, there is no problem for removal even if you try to make up one.
then they can make a statement as to why they have a weapon ingame that does not have evidence supporting it’s existence that fits gaijin requirements
3596 replies on this topic and no evidence that fits gaijins standards
no reply from devs despite them replying on things like stinger
3 Likes
Except the missile already exists and we know they have the knwoledge to install IR seekers into missiles.
So it’s more than possible it exists, even though us average joes can’t find it with a simple google search.
And no i don’t know where Gajin has there sources of it existing or not has from.
This thread is just giga cope.
You can’t balance a missile on it’s own, as only vehicles carry BR number and thus can be balanced. It definitely boosts the performance and balance anemic things like SM3 or SU-34, but adding those missiles to 30SM wasn’t needed at all.
“they have the knowledge” does not mean that they actually have done it. it is just an assumption, not proof. like i said, it does not fit gaijin’s posted requirements.
the whole thread is full of assumptions because no one is able to provide actual proof.