Platforms in the sense of A2A capabilities.
Ironically Su-34 gets 8x instead of 6x R-77s as specified by Sukhoi’s official website, because Gaijin’s “consultant” said “trust me bro”
its not terrible at it better then say a tornado
You can take only two ARHs when carrying AGMs.
@Smugspite
It is but Tornado was already a BR step lower (two after changes take place).
If they were going to answer, they would have done so by now.
I get it, it’s pretty embarassing for them after denying countless reports with far more evidence than this fictional weapon has.
It’s very dissapointing that they allowed this to happen. Either they knowlingly added a fictional weapon, or their procedures failed so badly that they allowed a fictional weapon to be added to the game.
The silence speaks volumes.
has anyone put proof that the Kh-38MT exists? or still none
still absolutely nothing
hot
Im actually kind of surprised there was only 1 WT CC that actually brought the subject up in a vid at this point as well. Just about everyone that plays top tier (barring players that only play russia) hate this thing.
The fact there is no evidence its a real missile should be pretty big news I’d think 🤔
who did?
TEC
Yes, its an sentence
TheEuropeanCanadian.
tbh, I don’t watch his stuff, I find its largely just content farming and click-bait stuff.
no wonder I didnt know,
I dont like sitting for 20 minutes to hear what could be said in 30 seconds
I looked it up, and surprisingly it’s a 10 minute video.
I was expecting a 10 hour one where he reads every comment in this thread.
Spoiler
id say its the other way around, mat at least gets vids on new stuff out very quickly which is nice when im not gonna try stuff out on the dev server
stopped watching him after his horrendous take on the boycott situation we had a few years back. Absolutely no value in his channel
He’s easily the worst Warthunder CC.
Still waiting for a statement from the devs… Where are the sources?
never
Because there were never any sources, admitting so would humiliate them :)