no, why would they give that out
okay for my understanding Gaijin can’t use classified to buff vehicle in the game
so, if KH-38MT is classified then they shouldn’t be able to add it in the game
but then it exists
2 Likes
I agree with you here for once.
MT don’t need a good carrier platform.
And after multiple people saying the new EF flightmode sucks, i tried it yesterday. It indeed doesn’t turn nearly as well as it did and i wouldn’t call it an ufo anymore, that title goes now fully to the Rafale, but i still had i think 5 ground kills and 5 air kills in that single match.
I already said 30SM doesn’t need KH-38s.
I hope you won’t argue that SM3 and SU-34 are good platforms.
Personally considering how I primarily use the Su-34, I would trade the Kh-38MT for the FAB-1500 UMPK or Kh-59 (with APK-9) any day. It would be more beneficial for me.
just saying its questionable if those would have mobile target tracking as well and the IR sensor isnt just used for last step approaches to correct target images trough jamming etc
at the very least I do hope if the hammer gets hit with that nerf so will the KH-38MT means its effectiveness will go down a lot (this is cope it will probably still be one of the best AGMs in game lmao)
For classified stuff they’ll use approximations and try to fit things in the game like that.
@ron_2303
You’re here asking for Gaijin to give out full docs about thousands upon thousands of vehicles/weapons for free. Research costs money.
Remove all fnf missiles and top tier gets improved by atleast 50%
1 Like
That would heal higher tiers of GRB with one swoop, but I guess tanks are there to suffer.
Mobile targets? Only mobile targets which I attack are ships :D
Thats why I would prefer Kh-59 or Kh-59M. Mainly against carriers which are pretty tough targets.
1 Like
british, german and italian mains watching Russian and American mains losing their minds over losing FnF weapons with our brimstones
3 Likes
If the MT performed like a Spike or PARS or Hellfire we wouldn’t be having this convo lmaooo
15 Likes
if russian helis used hellfires then the flight path and performance wouldnt be so wrong
12 Likes
Looks like the topics dying down with no dev answer… I dont think the devs are gonna do anything about this at this point
20 Likes
Even if they answer, don’t expect evidence.
At best they will pull a “our consultant says …”
Su-27’s IAS structural limit is literally right there in the manual and they deny its existence and say “it only says it can fly at this speed indefinitely” (Which is to be expected for all aircrafts that are not engine limited)
6 Likes
first questions first, is that manual declassified?
su34 is one of the best cas platforms in the game literally a huge skill issue bro
Yrah I remember reading that bug report answer… just another page in the book of idiocies stated by gaijin
1 Like
it is
that manual was used multiple times for bug reports until now
but gaijin always finds one reason or another to not accept it like sudo showed
1 Like