Colleague? You’re working for russian military production?
1 Like
i deleted what i said, because there is no use, i couldnt be given a direct answer and with that i cant also post here the conversation…
Well that would be the closest thing to evidence that we would have in a span of 2400+ posts. But you’re right, that wouldn’t be enough to call it real due to multiple reasons.
1 Like
it would be of no use, would result in more speculation and no results… in conclusion, the points in the post cant be proven. And in my opinion also cant be disproven…
(I will not respond to PM’s, thank you.)
what else are they?
russian Laser seekers look completly diffrent
That is an IR seeker with improved gimbal with a wider lense, thats why its diferent from the KH-29T, due to the KH29T being a TV system… similar but diferent…
i know,
the guy i repllied to was saying it isnt an IR seeker
1 Like
The more I try to find data on this missile the more I question this mockup.
what about it?
I already told you all. This mockup has “KH-38ME” written on it. That doesn’t stand nor for Laser, nor for Thermal. It’s a general purpose mockup.
3 Likes
yes, because its a modular concept, that mockup isnt for advertisement of a missile type in particular, but for its family.
3 Likes
its general advertisment for the family and whats possible for all we know right now the IR version just does not exist, might have been advertisment for possible development and so on.
Even if its real like you seem to have hinted it with your earlier messages, because to be fair random guy in the internet claims A, just isnt trustworthy. Its highly questionable to actual capability and specs the missle would have. Nobody can proof its meaned for targeted moveable tanks and not similar to the AASMR static positions. For all sense and purposes the missle is to new if it exists with no data available.
Even more so it just ruins the game right now and gajin doesnt find the solutions to solve it )like increased spawn points the more you take with you)
7 Likes
That’s just your guess.
1 Like
i dont see you proving its existence, we are so far in and its existence has not been proven.
Until proven otherwise it does not exist, no matter how hard you cope
6 Likes
congratulation, you found mock ups, which do not prove workability, integration and so on
1 Like
That’s not the interesting part though. I’ll leave it up to you which is which
that translates to your post being pretty much useless since u dont wanna explain apparantly
2 Likes
Sure thing man
“random guy in the internet claims A, just isnt trustworthy.” thats the issue with i said before and im pretty aware of it, and even if i post something of an answer, anyone and rightfully so, can say im making stuff up.
I also agree with you on other points, but makes no sense in removing it from the game, the solutions needs to be another one.
Aswell as said before, in the brochure there was the missile (that means nothing), but imagine that if im a factory that has propaganda about something i cant provide to potentional interested buyers due to the current… Operation… that is making me go domestic i would change to the most cost effective solution with proven results, and where my most expensive thing, the targeting pod, can be re-used and thats why theres usage in a fair volume of the KH-38ML. Overall the most cost effective solution.
" Its highly questionable to actual capability and specs the missle would have. Nobody can proof its meaned for targeted moveable tanks and not similar to the AASMR static positions. " Agreed, the mockup tho, has the IR seeker with wide lenses.
One also cannot compare the different seeker heads of the AGM-65 family, as you cannot compare the KH-29T seeker to the KH-38 seekers due to being diferent stages.
There is also another issue that i like to call, USSR/RUSSIAN Budget Engineering. The aproach to common issues is viewed in different ways and therefore solutions, less dependence on the electronic part of the thing and more hardware inclined.
This being said, you cannot prove its existence or absence.
P.S. i know my answer doesnt add something conclusive, but well… also might have english error.
2 Likes