Exactly the best info on seekerhead operation (the brochure) does not suggest an ability to track vehicles
they have more proven stuff and functionality then this missle
they rightfully have been removed already for this reason
At the least the MT should be nerfed with the Hammer to limited tracking ability
1 Like
Are you seriously asking people to prove the Abrams exist?
you cant assume it hasnt.
1 Like
Not really. The maus is brought back every year. The 38cm sturm was added a couple years back. Need I go on?
we currently cant even assume its exist. You guys need to prove that in the first place
the sturm literally existed and iirc was used
1 Like
That’s not what we were talking about… the abrams armor is still classified, thus based on what he said, it should be removed no?
maus and the sturm existed.
Is the reload of the sturm unrealistic? yes, but both still exist not like the KH 38MT currently
Depending on how they do it, I agree
Burden of proof is to prove its existence
but we know it actualy works, we do not for the KH38mt, seriously stop trolling
The maus’s hull was the only thing that was truly together. The turret was still being made. It was only made post war by the Soviet’s if I recall correctly
but it isnt? we dont have any domestic late abrams in game because the armor is classified
we only have the export armor package for the proposed swedish abrams
Yes we do, it’s a missile and an IR seeker, tech that exists for a long time now.
2 Likes
that you’re all clinging to this rocket. There are enough other non-existent weapons or configurations of these weapons or settings in the game.
2 Likes
Very few that have the same impact on the meta tho
ok so add it with an IR seeker like stormshadow has irl
1 Like
Lack of proof goes both ways
2 Likes