Glad you agree it exists, go tell Motorola that; however the Swift F7 is on the list as it’s equipped with guns in-game where it wasn’t IRL.
It did test the Fireflash… without guns equipped according to the sources I found.
@dedale_stargate The Kron is not fake. Photographs of its production literally exist.
@SwingfireOP
Better tell Motorola that, he wants its APDS rounds removed.
Oh im well aware, I wanna go to bovington and see it, as well as the M48A1 they have
Where’d you get that from? last I checked BEAsystems web page it had adens mounted
same as the other swifts…
https://www.baesystems.com/en-uk/heritage/vickers-supermarine-type-541-swift
@simsimkek
The actual average speed of the Kh-38MT missile is ~600m/s at a range of 40km, I tested it.
Launch altitude is 12 km, launch speed is 1.2 M, range is 40 km.
This missile flew this distance in 66 s
And the bug reporting manager who talks to the developer told us that the statshark is inaccurate. This was on the Russian forum
I mean if you want to spawn a turretless and probably engineless battleship, you won’t have my disapproval, you do you
It’s inaccurate for most things
So remove those guns ?
If it didn’t fire that APDS remove it, is that an issue ?
40,000 meters / 66 seconds is 606 meters per second.
So, let’s get this straight.
You want gaijin to do an uber patch removing every fake item all at once, or you want none of them removing?
You do realise how ridiculous this sounds right?
Except the mans stated in the past hes a CAS hater and a Tank Only mode proponent. If he had his way planes would be removed from the game.
Making sure people can’t call you out on hypocrisy and double standard isn’t ridiculous.
If you start picking and choosing what gets removed first, second, …, last you open yourself up to accusations from the angry mob as not everyone will share the same opinion about the order in which things get nuked.
Why have you removed this at this time, it’s needed in it’s TT ?
Why haven’t you removed this first, it’s the oldest fake in the game ?
Why have you removed vehicle X first, I believe vehicle Y is more OP and should be gone first ?
You can actually see this playing out in the recent addition of turret baskets, where plenty of complaints ended up being:
“Why did X nation got turret baskets implemented while Y, Z, U nations haven’t ? Gaijin bad and likes double standards”.
You seem unable to understand that your way of doing things is the same as Gaijin’s, where the only difference being is the opinion you base those things on, which is something subjective.
Yeah, you’re right about that bit, I’ll take it out.
People can literally trace my comments against CAS in general dating years back in TO threads and whatnot. I don’t even use the 38MT myself to dunk on hapless ground vehicles as that’s exactly what I’m fighting against.
I want to play a mode without aircraft, but if that isn’t possible I’d want those aircraft to be balanced between each other.
Making sure people can’t call you out on hypocrisy and double standard isn’t ridiculous.
That ship has long since sailed. Case in point is with the scimitar and fox turret rotation changes. The report those changes were based on was based on feelings and had no hard data in it. To be fair, the turret rotation was too fast and needed to be reduced and it’s impossible to come up with a reliable figure for and manually rotated turret, but the way the report was acted upon with scant evidence while others are rejected chaffs somewhat.
That is more down to gaijins habit of introducing features slowly and inconsistently, see spall liners as another example, with a dose of people getting used to it combined with bugs like the pump on the Abrams knocking out the turret drive which makes it far worse on that tank. An argument could be made that the baskets are too sensitive at the moment and more time should have been taken to implement a degradation system rather than an on/off system which I agree with but we are where we are with it.
You seem unable to understand that your way of doing things is the same as Gaijin’s, where the only difference being is the opinion you base those things on, which is something subjective.
My way of doing things is based on reality and an understanding of software development. Your way is asking gaijin to upset their entire planning and devote a major feature release to the removal of vehicles. One is realistic, the other is not.
I too want all the fake items removing, we agree with that however your approach would ensure it never happens.
he is specifically talking about things that were only a concept
like the Begleitpanzer and not build at all,
unlike the Mirage 4k as an example
What’s this list about?
List of things that developers will remove in 6-8 years
Unfinished prototypes given production equipment.
The rules regarding these have never changed.
