xm975 is roland on modified m109 chasis, so technically exist
m247 fully exist, its just garbage and it didnt work properly
t92 exist
panzer 57 one prototype
radkampfwagen exist, few prototypes was built
idk
idk
it fly, but no missiles or radar, only dummies missiles
idk
the disrespectful, one of the first chobham composite armor mbts to ever exist, beat out most competition at the time, one was built, multiple turret was being built, tested firing, armor tested, mobility tests, multiple test was done, it is still exist to this day
fv4202 exist, see other guy message
afaik st-a1 exist, not sure a2
kikka real, fly once, gun was built, never installed tho
idk
nope, fake
It uses the same cannon as the M36B2s that were provided to japan. Those had the capability to fire HEAT-FS.
edit: In any case, gaijin has stated for a long time that ammo options are used as balancing factors; as long as a vehicle could mount or use them, it’s open to receiving them. Some have also lost certain weapons, like the F-1 which does not have the AIM-9Ls it did IRL.
So there’s no reason to talk about any of this anymore. Gaijin will keep pushing their hypocrisy and double standards and we can do nothing about it.
I was discussing how the thing should be done so it’s done in a right way.
This introduces talks about their double standards and whatnot, which is something that definitely could be avoided. I doubt the game would end up in flames if Leopards and M1s haven’t received turret baskets before everyone else.
This could easily have been postponed, but it wasn’t.
You don’t have to devote a whole update to that, just hide vehicles in question and be done with it. I don’t think they even have plans about this topic, as not being able to find replacements for fiction that’s 5-10 years old is honestly unbelievable.
You’re asking to remove quite a few vehicles which requires tree reworks, as well as multiple ammunition changes which require BR recalculation. That’s a hell of a lot of work for a point release and would be done in stages in any sane environment.
I would push back against anyone asking for that level of change in a point release. Version numbers are major.minor.patch.build and id argue that magnitude of change across multiple trees and nations would qualify for a major release. Majors are planned months in advance, I imagine gaijin know what the winter release will look like in a broad sense already, with the autumn one features pretty much nailed down already. At least, I’d hope so.
So yeah, i don’t think it’s really practical for a big bang removal like that. A commitment to removing them across several releases is much more practical and far more likely to happen.
I’ve requested the info from BEA archives for it, as im pretty sure they did mount the guns on the F7, they made 2 prototypes and twelve production runs to trial it, pretty sure at least one would of mounted guns, dont need 12 planes to test one form of missile.
