what
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
2 Likes
@RazorVon gives nothing tho, ig hes not on this forums?
Name changes are a wonder online.
Anyways, back to topic.
Kh-38MT doesn’t exist and needs to be removed.
2 Likes
Look for someone whos name has A and W.
1 Like
Thb it is getting kind of boring. Would love to see a definitive proof of one or the other.
1 Like
al, al Al-Khalid?
my name
Dang ive been found out as razor’s 3rd alt account its joever for me, how am I gonna get my 2 rubles per post now? Im gonna starve.
Man skipped over second and pinned you straight for third lol. Imagine letting someone on the forums live that much in your head rent free in this economy.
No, because as a contrast seeker Range is a function of the size of the Targeting gate that is used, which is a layer on top of the optical train.
It’s more so that you lose a lot of detail out of the imager, if a pair of identical scenes were set up, but adjusted in intensity based on know data to produce the minimal contrast scenes.
The scene where a WGU-10/B could comfortably have full spatial resolution (B/W + 6 grey steps, + target gate super-sampling) to the limits of it’s video output.
Conversely the -38MT’s seeker has no contrast at all , and so would display full black / white, or noise. As the contrast within the scene is less then the specified step function and so the returned value would be constant across the space.
In the alternate, where the same scene was to the provided specs. of the -38MT, the WGU-10/B still sees everything, but it makes no major difference (due to the image being displayed to the pilot being entirely synthetic, as having dynamic Histogram Stretching applied based upon the hotest point near / within the target gate and the the coldest point in the scene much detail is preserved)
What I’m saying is that it should be far less useful as an imager and basically just show up strange series of flat rectangular blobs, that might represent a target, nothing close to the Third gen Thermals it has arbitrarily been conferred in game.
Just look at the provided footage from the WGU-10 from Desert storm, it’s not the the WGU-10 is actually that good anyway, so relatively the -38MT should be far worse for a real scene.
9 Likes
GNDM thinks the entire forum is my alt account cause I criticize Russian equipment and make valid critiques of War Thunder.
I have only one account as per forum rules, and I reported RazerVon for being an unauthorized alt account of another when it first arrived.
GNDM thinks Russians lambasted me cause I criticize Russian equipment and War Thunder.
I’ve never defended Russia’s tech tree, only ever criticized.
1 Like
Yeah, apparently having opinions opposite of mine makes you my alt account.
@RazerVon 's opinions are majority the opposite of mine, and of course many of your opinions stated here are entirely different to mine.
All because I say “I’d like to see evidence of Kh-38MT existing or being cancelled before coming to any conclusion.”
1 Like
Out of topic.
Back to topic, where is the 38MT in VVS depot or their evaluation document?
1 Like
most because alvis tends to stumble upon the worst takes possible i think he just gets a kick pissing people off lol
4 Likes
he mastered the art of rage baiting
Ah yes, bad takes like “Evidence of Kh-38MT existing would be nice.” [The subject of this topic.]
Okay bud…
1 Like
congratulations WT forums, we have gotten to 8000 messages and achieved nothing.
No proof of the KH38MT being real
No say from anyone close to gaijin let alone an actual response to this thread breaking the google results for the KH38 family of missiles
Just arguments over who is bait and who isn’t bait, by the people who are 90% bait
Flags are still weaponised too
17 Likes
You know it’s bad when the wt forums page is the second thing that pops up
1 Like
I just hope that all the information we’ve gathered so far is enough to grant a hefty nerf to this weapon, your insight is always welcome.
4 Likes